Monday, June 30, 2014

Hermocrates: A Non-Reading

We've done a lot of reading of Plato recently; about some non-reading of Plato? Critias seems to suggest that there was another dialogue in the planning, a Hermocrates as it is usually called, which would round out the trilogy beginning with Timaeus. There are two possibilities here:

(A) Plato intended to write Hermocrates but never did for some unknown reason.
(B) Plato never intended to write it.

Why might one suggest a third dialogue that one never intends to write? One possibility is precisely to get people thinking about what it would be. Critias, the discourse by an Athenian, is about an Ancient Athens that turned back and defeated a mighty imperial sea power. Hermocrates of Syracuse, while not a strong general, was an accomplished and respected diplomat whose work in building Sicilian alliances enabled the city of Syracuse to turn back and defeat a mighty imperial sea power -- Athens herself. So just having him there in juxtaposition raises the question of whether he would have discussed this if he ever had his own speech, and, more importantly, raises the contrast between Ancient Athens and the imperial democracy of the Peloponnesian War.

On the other hand, it could be that Plato just didn't get to it. Can we give a reasonable guess about what its topic would be? We have a very few scattered indications.

(1) The task Socrates sets his guests is to "present our city prusuing a war that reflects her true character" (Tim. 20b); that is, to present the ideal city of Socrates in action.
(2) The three guests agree that Critias's story of Ancient Athens fits the bill.
(3) Critias's account of the plan doesn't mention Hermocrates at all:

We thought that because Timaeus is our expert in astronomy and has made it his main business to know the nature of the universe, he should speak first, beginning with the origin of the universe, and concluding with the nature of human beings. Then I'll go next, once I'm in possession of Timaeus' account of the origin of human beings and your account of how some of them came to have a superior education. I'll introduce them, as not only Solon's account but also his law would have it, into our coutroom and make them citizens of our ancient city--as really being those Athenians of old whom the report of the sacred records has rescued from obscurity--and from then on I'll speak of them as actual Athenian citizens. (Tim. 27a-b)

(4) Socrates does explicitly say that Hermocrates will speak (Crit. 108a) and Hermocrates and Critias seem to confirm it (Crit 108b-c).

And beyond knowing from Thucydides and Xenophon who Hermocrates is, this is all we have to go on. Any speculation has to work by extrapolation or analogy. Some possibilities.

(a) After Socrates describes the ideal city in the Republic, he goes on to describe how it degenerates. So perhaps Hermocrates would talk about the degeneration of the ideal city. The problem is that we already know that Ancient Athens doesn't degenerate -- it's going to be destroyed in cataclysm, with only remnants surviving.

(b) Hermocrates, for practical purposes, destroyed the Syracusan Expedition by which Athens aimed to extend its naval empire. So perhaps Hermocrates would talk about that as a contrast to Critias's account of Ancient Athens. The major difficulty here is that the opposition is fairly obvious already, and the topic doesn't obviously flow from the task Socrates set his guests.

(c) Perhaps Hermocrates would pick up from the cataclysm, so to speak, and talk about how to build the ideal city from scratch. Plato does something like this in the Laws. But why Hermocrates? We know from Critias that Timaeus has devoted his life to astronomy, and Critias is related to Solon; all we know about Hermocrates is that he was a Sicilian statesman.

Plato -- even his gaps are interesting. But in this case it's anyone's guess, so feel free to indulge in your own non-reading of the Hermocrates.

3 comments:

  1. Enbrethiliel3:32 AM

    +JMJ+


    This reminds me that former child actress Mara Wilson said she didn't want to be part of the rumoured Mrs. Doubtfire sequel because sequels that aren't part of a trilogy "suck." LOL! Maybe Plato didn't want anyone to think that of Critias? =P


    In any case, I'm sad that we're left hanging. I, too, would love to see Socrates's ideal city "in action." But I'm also wondering why that action would be a war. What did war mean to Socrates/Plato?


    Enbrethiliel

    ReplyDelete
  2. branemrys9:39 AM

    That's a good question. I don't know if there's a definite answer, but I do have a thought. One of the things I want to do when I've done all or most of the dialogues is to look at them as a sort of philosophical analysis of the Peloponnesian War. If we include both the First and the Second Peloponnesian War (and we should, because the end of the First didn't completely end all the fighting, and immediately set up for the Second, or main, War in a kind of ongoing cold war), the war between Athens and Sparta, although fitful, lasted literally Socrates' entire life -- it starts about the time of his birth and he's tried and killed not long after the Spartans are pushed out at the end. War-related issues occur throughout the dialogues (like the repeated criticisms of Themistocles and Pericles), and the Atlantis Myth gives us a topsy-turvy version in which Athens is in the Spartan place and Atlantis is the Athenian place. So perhaps one of the things Plato is doing is setting out deliberately to critique Athens' conduct before and during the War.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Enbrethiliel10:09 AM

    +JMJ+


    That's interesting! And this is where I try to hide that I totally slacked off on Greek history, until I can get myself to a library and cram what I can . . . =P

    ReplyDelete

No anonymity (but consistent pseudonyms allowed). Abusive comments, especially directed toward other commenters, will be deleted; abusive commenters will be hunted down and shot. By posting a comment you agree to these terms and conditions.

Please understand that this weblog runs on a third-party comment system, not on Blogger's comment system. If you have come by way of a mobile device and can see this message, you may have landed on the Blogger comment page; your comments will only be shown on this page and not on the page most people will see, and it is much more likely that your comment will be missed (although I do occasionally check to make sure that no comments are being overlooked).