Sunday, June 21, 2026

A Poem Re-Draft and Two New Poem Drafts

Leaves Falling 

A man may love a woman, and a woman love a man,
so take my hand in yours, though we have no path or plan,
that we may dance in springtime when the flowers bloom in cheer,
and pirouette, with spinning to defy the turning year. 

Then after comes a summer, when we wear a splendid crown,
and then we weep in autumn when the leaves are falling down.
A love may be as pure as sky and burn with blazing light,
undoing every darkness and making day from night,

but we ourselves, like water, through our fingers slip away;
can love be everlasting when we have no strength to stay?
Beginnings come to endings for all things we love and know;
we weep while leaves are falling, then after, only snow. 

So take my hand in dancing, for the time will swiftly run,
but we may love together for a while in hope and sun;
perhaps it will give smiles that endure to our recall,
yea, even as our tears well up as leaves begin to fall.


Cloud of Unknowing

A very vasty shadow,
unknowing like to wings,
is spread across the heavens
within which star-suns sing.

All shadows in that shadow
are sleeping, rich with peace;
though they are waxing, waning,
it stays and does not cease.

The night is but a duskling,
though midnight is its hue,
its blackness not the blackness
of the dark beyond all view.

For in that darkness shadows
are blazing like to flame
and all that we think darkness
is darkness but in name.

The horror that you suffer,
the thing you do not know,
against that nightmost darkness
is but a glow-worm's glow.

We feel our way like blind men;
in shade we trip and fall;
but in darkness in its glory
we scarce can move at all,

so when it falls upon us,
we cannot do but kneel
and pray there as we waver
before the darkness real.


Christmas

The stars in the quiet
shine softly above
as wind in its silence
is whispering of love.
The world in its sorrow
may weep for the day,
but high in the heaven
the angels all say:
Fear not, fear not,
but bow down to pray,
and know him, and love him,
the babe born today.

The sins of the nations
rise high to the sky;
the heathen are raging
with violence and lie;
but look to your Savior,
who shows you the way,
and meet your salvation
as shepherds now say:
Fear not, fear not,
but bow down to pray,
and know him, and love him,
this bright Christmas Day.

Saturday, June 20, 2026

Bai T. Moore, Murder in the Cassava Patch

 Introduction

Opening Passage:

From behind the rusty bars of a cell in Monrovia's South Beach Prison facing the Atlantic Ocean, I can now try to piece together all the circumstances leading to the violent storm which nearly tore off the roofs from many houses in the Dewoin country one bright Sunday morning in the year 1957. 

It rose over the discovery in a cassava patch, of the mutilated body of Tene, the daughter of a well known Dewoin family who live in Bendabli, just a stone's throw from Amina, the former Paramount Chief's town, twenty miles from Monrovia on the Monrovia-Bomi Hills motor road.

Summary: Gortokai, or Kai, for short, is in love with a beautiful local Bendabli girl, Tene. There is something about the relationship to begin with. While they are not physically related, Kai and Tene were raised as brother and sister, because Tene's parents took him in when he was young. When Kai decides he wants to marry Tene, some people think it wrong, but technically it is not against any of the rules; the primary problem is that Kai has no family, so he has no family to represent him in the negotiations over Tene's brideprice. He has to rely on Kema, Tene's sister.  Something is off about Kema's role in the matter, too; she is very obliging, and suspiciously so. Because Tene is so beautiful, and because she is, it would seem, not the sort of girl to lack for suitors, Kai is easily convinced by friends that he needs to take steps to make sure that Tene loves him, and so he goes to an old sand reader, Bleng, who confirms his suspicions and offers to provide him powerful love medicine to conjure her love. All of this is rolling, in a chain of events, to a bad end, the bad end with which the story opens.

Murder in the Cassava Patch is in a sense a story about a society falling apart -- rather ironically, because the story takes place during the period of William Tubman's national unification policies. But it is precisely this that is creating problems. Liberia is modernizing and becoming, slowly, wealthier, but the cracks in traditional Liberian like Bendabli are beginning to show. The younger folk don't take the old traditions quite seriously, but they have not come up with anything that actually replaces them, so there is a kind of lost quality to all the young people in the tale. But there is a more immediate factor, and that is drink. There is rum or palm wine on almost every page. Even Kai's name, Gortokai, means 'Brown-Jug Man'; he is literally named after the jugs in which Dutch gin was stored. The drinking is not purely social; it is extensive, and often associated with bad judgment. Alcohol can dull pain or boredom, but it also dulls your ability to pull yourself out of your problems. 

Murder in the Cassava Patch is a tale of scheming arising out of blind desire. One of the interesting questions throughout is how much we can trust anything Kai says; indeed, almost everyone in the novella seems to be dissembling in one way or another. Kai wants Tene; Tene wants out of Bendabli; Kema wants money. These goals lead them each to hide what they are actually doing, and in each case it ends up being counterproductive. Neither Bleng nor Kai's friends seem entirely above-board about anything. But Kai is our narrator, and at times there seem reasons to think that he is spinning parts of the story in his favor. The overall story at a glance can seem quite simple, but at every turn Moore has layered in psychological complexities until everything is a tangle. 

Favorite Passage:

Bleng placed the bag on the mat and began to unfasten it. I had my eyes glued on every movement he made. After a few unsuccessful attempts, the sand reader poured the contents of the bag into the mat. They were an assortment of quartz crystals, large yellow beads, smooth pebbles and some strange-looking beans. One of the pebbles rolled under my stool. I tried to reach for it. Bleng stopped me. 

 "No one is allowed to touch these sacred objects unless I give them permission. God gave them to me in a dream and taught me how to use them to help mankind. He told me not to let anyone touch them, else they would loose their magic power.“ 

 The contents of the bag were collected and tossed into the air and allowed to scatter on the mat again. Bleng viewed the objects with penetrating eyes for a minute or two without uttering a word. He broke the silence, by murmuring the word "Tene“ to himself several times, nodding in between. The old man cleared his throat and offered to tell me what he saw in the crystals. For some reason which I cannot explain, I turned pale and felt nervous. Bleng looked straight into my eyes; "young man,“ he uttered. I felt a sudden thump against my chest. It was my heart, beating like a machine. "Tene's heart is divided.“ The old man revealed.

Recommendation: Highly Recommended.

Friday, June 19, 2026

Selecting and Shaping like the Gardener

 Generally, the moral substance of liberty is this: that man is not meant merely to receive good laws, good food or good conditions, like a tree in a garden, but is meant to take a certain princely pleasure in selecting and shaping like the gardener. Perhaps that is the meaning of the trade of Adam. And the best popular words for rendering the real idea of liberty are those which speak of man as a creator. We use the word “make” about most of the things in which freedom is essential, as a country walk or a friendship or a love affair. When a man “makes his way” through a wood he has really created, he has built a road, like the Romans. When a man “makes a friend,” he makes a man. And in the third case we talk of a man “making love,” as if he were (as, indeed, he is) creating new masses and colours of that flaming material an awful form of manufacture. In its primary spiritual sense, liberty is the god in man, or, if you like the word, the artist.

[G. K. Chesterton, "The Free Man", A Miscellany of Men.]

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Antisthenes

 A man said to [Antisthenes] one day, “Many people praise you.” “Why, what evil,” said he, “have I done?” 
When he turned the rent in his cloak outside, Socrates seeing it, said to him, “I see your vanity through the hole in your cloak.” 
On another occasion, the question was put to him by some one, as Phanias relates, in his treatise on the Philosophers of the Socratic school, what a man could do to show himself an honourable and a virtuous man; and he replied, “If you attend to those who understand the subject, and learn from them that you ought to shun the bad habits which you have.” 
Some one was praising luxury in his hearing, and he said, “May the children of my enemies be luxurious.” 
Seeing a young man place himself in a carefully studied attitude before a modeller, he said, “Tell me, if the brass could speak, on what would it pride itself?” And when the young man replied, “On its beauty.” “Are you not then,” said he, “ashamed to rejoice in the same thing as an inanimate piece of brass?” 
A young man from Pontus once promised to recollect him, if a vessel of salt fish arrived; and so he took him with him, and also an empty bag, and went to a woman who sold meal, and filled his sack and went away; and when the woman asked him to pay for it, he said, “The young man will pay you, when the vessel of salt fish comes home.”

[Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Philosophers, Book VI, "Life of Antisthenes".] 

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Fortnightly Book Distribution (June 2026)

In 2018, I did an experiment in seeing how the Fortnightly Books were distributed, globally. What I decided on was the country of the author. That's not always useful for ancient authors -- there's no real sense in which St. Maximus Confessor is an Israeli author, despite having been born within the modern borders of Israel. It also runs into problems with British literature, because the authors who contribute to what we think of as British literature are born all over -- Kipling and T. H. White were born in India, J. R. R. Tolkien was born in South Africa, etc. One can make sense of Kipling as an Indian author, but it's literally just happenstance that Tolkien was born in South Africa, and it has nothing to do with his literary work. Nonetheless, birthplace of author (sometimes probable birthplace), as determined by modern borders, turned out to be the best way to do it, for the most part. I was thinking about it recently, so here I have updated it to the most recent Fortnightly Book, Flaubert's Sentimental Education.



Algeria

Augustine, Confessions

Suetonius, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars


Austria

Douglas, South Wind


Canada



China

Cao Xueqin & Gao E, A Dream of Red Mansions


Czech Republic

Hašek, The Good Soldier Švejk



Egypt


--, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Pearl, Sir Orfeo

[Certain Members of the Detection Club: Chesterton, Whitechurch, Cole & Cole, Wade, Christie, Rhode, Kennedy, Sayers, Knox, Wills Crofts, Jepson, Dane, Berkeley], The Floating Admiral

Adams, Watership Down

Austen, Sanditon, The Watsons, Lady Susan, Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, Persuasion, Mansfield Park

Baring, The Coat Without a Seam, In My End Is My Beginning


Beerbohm, Zuleika Dobson

Brontë (A), The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

Brontë (Ch), Villette

Burdekin, Swastika Night


Edgeworth, Belinda

Eliot, Romola

Gordon (Lord Byron), Childe Harold's Pilgrimage


Julian, The Showings





Sewell, Black Beauty

Shakespeare, Histories

Shelley (M), Frankenstein

Shelley (P), Prometheus Unbound



Barbey d'Aurevilly, Les Diaboliques

Bédier, The Romance of Tristan & Iseult

Dumas, The Three Musketeers (with Maquet)








Georgia





Greece

Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound






Iceland

--, Eyrbyggja Saga









Kipling, Kim



Iraq





Israel

Josephus, The Jewish War


Manzoni, The Betrothed



Endō, Silence



Jersey



Nigeria




Norway

Asbjornson & Moe, The Complete Norwegian Fairy Tales




Poland


Brown, Magnus





South Korea

Kim Man-Jung, The Nine-Cloud Dream


Spain

Sánchez de Cepeda y Ahumada (St. Teresa), The Life, The Interior Castle

Unamuno y Jugo, San Manuel Bueno, Mártir


Switzerland

Wyss, The Swiss Family Robinson


Syria


Ahmet Midhat Efendi, Felâtun Bey and Râkım Efendi

Michael Psellos, Fourteen Byzantine Rulers



Ukraine

Conrad, Nostromo


USA

Adler, Philosopher at Large





Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom's Cabin 









Landey, Triptych 

L'Engle, The Time Quartet

London, The Sea-Wolf 


Michener, Journey

McIntyre, The River Witch 

Miller, A Canticle for Leibowitz 

Morrison, The Devious Way 





Wister, The Virginian


Vietnam

Nguyễn Du, The Song of Kiều

Monday, June 15, 2026

Gustave Flaubert, Sentimental Education

 Introduction

Opening Passage:

In front of the Quai St. Bernard, the Ville de Montereau, which was just about to start, was puffing great whirlwinds of smoke. It was six o'clock on the morning of the 15th of September, 1840.

People rushed on board the vessel in frantic haste. The traffic was obstructed by casks, cables, and baskets of linen. The sailors answereed no questions. People jostled one another. Between the two paddle-boxes was a heap of parcels; the clamour was drowned in the loud hissing of the steam, which, making its way through the plates of sheet-iron, encompassed everything in a white mist, while the bell at the prow kept continuously ringing. (p. 1)

Summary: Frederick Moreau (Frédéric in the French) is a young man studying law, technically, although really he's one of many young men in the 1840s who have before them an endless array of choices and opportunities, with the result that they don't follow through on any choices and don't take adequate advantage of any opportunities. He meets up with his childhood friend Deslauriers, and through that connection is hoping to to get the assistance of a banker named Dambreuse in Paris. Nothing particularly comes of this, at least immediately, but it crosses his path with a shopkeepr, Arnoux, on whose wife Frederick has a crush. Frederick is able to get into Arnoux's good graces, which, of course, eventually makes it possible for him to be in contact with Madame Arnoux. Despite Frederick's efforts, Madame Arnoux will hold him off, but there's always something ambiguous about her doing so. One gets the impression that she very much likes the attention but just doesn't want to be an adulteress. Frederick, who is basically hanging around Paris and spending money, eventually has to go home, but the death of an uncle happens to put him in money again, so it's back to Paris. One of the Frederick's important characteristics is that he is good at looking wealthier than he is; his family is well off, but he repeatedly gives people the impression that he has more money at his disposal than he actually does. Given that the 'career' he ultimately chooses is effectively to live in debt while juggling mistresses, who are sometimes wealthy but always also in debt, and doing so by borrowing from friends and juggling those debts, it's a useful talent.

In some ways this is a very odd story, because there is not any story. The title is ironic; Frederick's 'sentimental education' is that he doesn't actually learn anything. He has no significant character arc, and he has no significant story. It's like reading an extraordinarily well written biography of the world's most uninteresting and most predictable man. It's not all boring, to be sure; a national revolution happens in Chapter XIV that accidentally makes Frederick's life somewhat interesting for a while. But (and this is certainly Flaubert's point) all the most interesting things happen entirely in the background. France is in a stage of unrest, and beyond happening to be at some student protests (it's something to do) and interacting with people who are involved with various factions of it (you sometimes need the social connections), Frederick's life has nothing to do with it. All of his friends have more interesting (although often more difficult) lives. All of his acquaintances are more committed to things than he is. He's essentially a cipher.

The result of this is a book that is very good in its episodes -- sometimes brilliant -- but whose only unity is that Frederick happens to be the same throughout the entire book. George Sand criticized the book for having no moral principle; the evils are not condemned. The author of the Introduction to my edition, Louise Bogan, characterizes this as 'obtuseness' and mere moralism, but in fact Sand is entirely right. Unhappy at how poorly the novel did, Flaubert spent plenty of time thinking about why, and he eventually came to the conclusion that people want 'falseness of perspective', that it 'ought to have a point' even though 'there's nothing of that sort in life' (p. vi). Yes, Gustave, when people read a story they expect it to have a point; brilliant discovery. 

I would actually have more sympathy with his complaint except that Flaubert is trying to have his cake and eat it. He is not avoiding 'falseness of perspective'. It's the same thing one sees with Madame Bovary (who is, however, an actually interesting character); Flaubert's style generates not realism but hyperrealism. Everything is very, very vividly described, in detail and clarity of description of which one can easily say 'there's nothing of that sort in life'. It's like a fever dream in which one follows in extraordinarily rich detail what happens to a vapid airhead who just keeps doing the same thing. It's all 'falseness of perspective'. Moreover, it is clear that Flaubert is not actually neutral. He avoids condemning, but he can't always help being sarcastic. He does not like Frederick, and it sometimes shows. Bogan makes a big deal about the book being satirical, and it is. Flaubert is skewering what he sees as the wasted lives and pointless pursuits of young men in France in the mid-nineteenth century. But you can't actually make a satire work if the satire never condemns anything. Thus we get this book, a brilliantly written series of scenes that vaguely gestures at something satirical while refusing (like Frederick!) to commit to anything.

It should not be concluded that I did not like the book, although there were parts I had to push through. The way to approach it is to give up on treating it as a novel, except in the most general way; if you read it as a series of ironic literary sketches that share a common character, the scenes of a wasted and wasteful life, the book is quite enjoyable. Again, the scenes, the episodes, are ingeniously written. It's just that the book actively resists letting you make much of it as a whole. This is indeed an extraordinary presentation of Flaubert as a brilliant writer; but it is entirely understandable why the (perhaps) rougher Madame Bovary, not Sentimental Education, is Flaubert's brilliant novel.

Favorite Passage:

Ledru-Rollin's ex-commissioner began by describing the tortures to which he had been subjected. As he preached fraternit""Why did you not cally to the Conservatives, and respect for the laws to the Socialists, the former tried to shoot him, and the latter brought cords to hang him with. After June he had been brutally dismissed. he found himself involved in a charge of conspiracy -- that which was connected with the seizure of arms at Troyes. He had subsequently been released for want of evidence to sustain the charge. Then the acting committee had sent him to London, where his ears had been boxed during a banquet at which he and his colleagues were being entertained. On his return to Paris---

"Why did you not call here, then, to see me?"

"You were always out! Your porter had mysterious airs -- I did not know what to think; and then, I had no desire to reappear before you in the character of a defeated man."

He had knocked at the portals of Democracy, offering to serve it with his pen, with his tongue, with all his energies. He had been everywhere repelled. They had mistrusted him. He had sold his watch, his bookcase, and even his linen. (p. 306)

Recommendation: Recommended, but again you should go in willing to enjoy some nice literary episodes and descriptions rather than a story that goes somewhere; it deliberately doesn't go much of any place.

****

Gustave Flaubert, Sentimental Education, Dover Publications (Mineola, NY: 2006).

Sunday, June 14, 2026

Fortnightly Book, June 14

 I accidentally sliced my finger cutting sausages for red beans and rice; nothing serious, but extensive typing is still a little awkward, which has slowed down getting things out. I should have the post on Sentimental Education ready tomorrow. But I wanted to say a little about the next fortnightly book, which is short enough that it might well be a one-week 'fortnight'. The book is Murder in the Cassava Patch, by Bai T. Moore.

Bai Tamia Johnson Moore (1916-1988) was born to the Gulah tribe in Liberia. He went to a missionary school and did so well that the missionaries arranged for him to go to high school, and then college, in the United States, where he attended Virginia Union and Howard. He returned to Liberia in 1941 and began collecting, editing, and studying Liberian poetry. The novella, Murder in the Cassava Patch, was published in 1968, and became an instant bestseller in Liberia, a status it has had ever since, having become the national novella of Libera, so to speak. It looks interesting enough, so we will see what it's like.


Anglican Theologians

It has been a very long time since I have done an internet quiz, so here is one I saw recently that was actually interesting food for thought: What Anglican Theologian Are You?



My broader 'constellation', according to the quiz consists of, besides Andrewes, Charles Gore, Joseph Butler, Dorothy Sayers, and William Laud. That makes a lot of sense; given the list of Anglican theologians used by the site, if asked what my favorites were, Butler and Sayers both would certainly have been in the top five. I would have also placed Richard Hooker in the top five, but, as it happens, he's number six here. I actually don't particularly like Gore, but it also makes sense -- just as a matter of abstract description, Gore reads as the sort of theologian I would like (I just don't think he does it very well). 

Laud is a bit of a surprise, but, of course, in real-life rather than just internet quizzes I am more High Church than even Laud, because I am actually Catholic and not just Catholic-ish. I suppose it also ties to why the Anglican theologians I am least like are all liberal Anglicans of various kind, which is not that I dislike liberal Anglican theology as such, but that I consider it to have an irritatingly defective ecclesiology. Liberal Anglicans and Latitutidinarians  tend to treat the Church on earth as a sort of clubby association, a Jesus fandom, the sort of ecclesiology that most grates on my nerves, but I tend to think of the Church on earth as more like a rough frontier town of a divine civilization. Thus it makes sense again why Gore would be the liberal Anglican, and Butler the latitudinarian, that score most highly for me.

Of course, it's purely a matter of questions selected and how they assign the answers, but Anglican theologians I would have expected to be higher on the list than they ended up here: Coleridge, Wesley, Farrer, Keble, Herbert, especially Farrer and Keble.

Friday, June 12, 2026

Music on My Mind

 

Celtic Thunder, "Heartland".

Dashed Off XVI

 We learn to love others as our neighbors by doing good to and for them.

the duty to aid others in the fulfillment of their duties

(1) Everything requires possibilities adequate to its own possibility.
(2) Possibilities require actualities with respect to which they are possible.

-- a horror story in which an otherwise normal narrator repeatedly puts himself/herself in danger due to having caught a mental infection

'It's disgusting' is a perfectly good reason, in most situations, for refusing to have anything to do with something.

To operationalize something requires first attending to the reasons why we take it to exist so as to be operationalized.

kennings (Jackson Crawford)
determinant + headword, e.g., raven + wine
Kennings do not merely describe; the headword must replace the word intended with something not merely descriptive.
There are typical kenning topics (men, women, weapons, elements, seasons, body parts, gold, ravens).
Not to be confused with heiti (alternate names), e.g., calling a woman Frigg, which however are sometimes used as parts of kennings.
Kennings are properly for occasional poems; they are only rarely used in narrative poetry like the Poetic Edda, with raven-related kennings (using 'raven' or about ravens) being the primary exception (presumably because of their easy recognizability).
Kennings can incorporate kennings (e.g., fire of the eel's road: eel's road = water, fire of water = gold).

the I as subject, the I as object of itself, the I as projected to be the object of others, the I as projected to represent others as subject
-- all of these are many-layered

the subjective anticipation of the self as objective, the objective recollection of the self as subjective

Everything that comes to be knwon is already implicit in what is already possessed.

We feel forward toward that which we take to be ourselves.

"The success of philosophy depends on its ability to combine the rationalist's intention of radicality and consistency with the empiricist's intention of concreteness." Patočka
"...man is not only a finite being, part of the world, but also a being which *has a world* which has knowledge of the world."
"Human life is not a life lived in and for itself; it is a living with others and with regard to them."
"The whole of being appears to us, always, in a certain mood-coloring; though the mood is in fact always our own inner 'state', it colors surrounding things at the same time, so that our objective environment, too, seems to partake of it."

Phenomenological method is essentially a method of the same and the different; this is what gives it its occasional quasi-Platonistic feel.

Given a tendency, recognized as such, we can often jump to an approximation of that to which it tends; and, indeed, this is required for beginning to have full understanding of the tendency.

The govenring principle of Malebranche's The Search After Truth is the radical contingency of mind-body union, as exemplified in error. Malebranche explicitly recognizes that this depreciates any conception of the soul as form of the body (LO xxxiv). It also leads to a conception of philosophy as dying until one dies (LO xxxvi-xxxvii).

The pursuit of elimianting error quickly reaches diminishing returns.

The possibilities for a thing are either inherent to it or received from something else.

The Church is inherently vocational.

The social often crosses the natural/artificial divide.

the Church as home away from home

'Home' as a name of God

Faced with liturgy, we respond with hymn.

We use models only after we have identified relevant causal information from the situation.

It is important to critical thinking to recognize that you also are intellectually crippled, and your intellectual agility is an adaptation to this.

Pardes: Song 4:13, Ecc 2:5, Neh 2:8

Trypho in Justin Martyr's Dialogue 7.9 rejects Christian interpretation because Christians hold that angels sinned and revolted from God.

Mal 2:7 -- priest // angel

Pirkei Avot 4:1 & the cardinal virtues

Ex 24:9-11 & Eucharist

Creativity in the mind is often a lot of fragments and a system of goals.

suggestive moral reasons, inclining moral reasons, definitive moral reasons

world as indefinitely expansive object of shared thought and action

The ideal demand for unification of our experience in terms of the world is in some sense a demand we receive from the world, as a final cause of inquiry. Part of the whole, we find ourselves in an order that tends to be, or at least suggests, the whole, and our most obvious possible role in that order includes knowing something of the whole and acting in light of that knowing.

affordance as an experience of possibility
--all experience is in some sense an experience of possibility, but affordance has a currently- counterfactual as well as presently-factual character

We experience the actual not merely as actual but as possible, but these are distinct experiences in our experience, however united.

affordance & action as involving the possible as available

volitional use & ourself as available for action

As measurers of time, we have a sense of ourselves as in some way beyond or outside any particular given measure of time. The same is true of space.

The body is experienced as a (broad) now as well as a (broad) here.

the flow of time as the narrativization of the temporally measured

the world as the domain of possible becoming and perishing

In talking about the 'flow of time', we are 'spatializing' time jsut as much as when we talk of it as lines and points and dimensions.

In the flow of change, we measure temporally and locally, and therefore by metonymy treat the measurement as flowing; this gives the local measurement a temporal character and the temporal measurement a local character.

"Ignosce Christe quod fui
Quod sum potenti corrige
Mei misertus dextera.
Quod sum futurus dirige." Robert Southwell

Virtue is important even for solving systemic problems, but if your plan for solving a systemic problem is to scold and punish people for being nonvirtuous, you have already failed.

Every person has many selves; we organize our lives by selves.

traditions as cultures of allusions

Pr 30:8 NIV 'daily bread'; NKJV 'the food allotted to me'; NRSV 'the food that I need'; HCSB 'the food I need'; D-R 'the necessaries of life'; ASV 'the food that is needful for me' with note, 'Hebrew the bread of my portion'; CJB 'the food I need today'; ESV 'the food that is needful for me'
Hebrew: lechem huqqi: prescribed/appointed bread
-- NIV seems on right track here in drawing on Lord's Prayer associations.

Everything in Proverbs 30 is concerned with some aspect or other of accepting limits and wanting the appropriate amount.

Pr 30:31 -- rooster/magpie/greyhound/charger
-- the Hebrew actually has along the lines of 'the agile girt in loins'; translators have been assuming an idiomatic expression for some kind of animal, but the literal meaning seems the point.

In order to interpret data, you need to know something about the causal process by which it was reached.

(actual possible effects -> nonactual possible effects (counterfactuals)) --> causes

Social institutions have developed in power and flexibility by increasingly being personified.

All legal systems exist before they are fully effective.

Thursday, June 11, 2026

And Larks Hang Singing, Singing, Singing

Summer
by Christina Rossetti 

Winter is cold-hearted,
Spring is yea and nay,
Autumn is a weathercock
Blown every way:
Summer days for me
When every leaf is on its tree; 

When Robin's not a beggar,
And Jenny Wren's a bride,
And larks hang singing, singing, singing,
Over the wheat-fields wide,
And anchored lilies ride,
And the pendulum spider
Swings from side to side,

And blue-black beetles transact business,
And gnats fly in a host, 
And furry caterpillars hasten
That no time be lost,
And moths grow fat and thrive,
And ladybirds arrive.

Before green apples blush,
Before green nuts embrown,
Why, one day in the country
Is worth a month in town;
Is worth a day and a year
Of the dusty, musty, lag-last fashion
That days drone elsewhere.

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Happy Efforts of Sagacity

 The business of Definition is part of the business of discovery. When it has been clearly seen what ought to be our Definition, it must be pretty well known what truth we have to state. The Definition, as well as the discovery, supposes a decided step in our knowledge to have been made. The writers on Logic in the middle ages, made Definition the last stage in the progress of knowledge; and in this arrangment at least, the history of science, and the philosophy derived from the history, confirm their speculative views. If the Explication of our Conceptions ever assume the form of a Definition, this will come to pass, not as an arbitrary process, or as a matter of course, but as the mark of one those happy efforts of sagacity to which all the sucessive advances of our knowledge are owing. 

[ William Whewell, Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, vol. 2 (John W. Parker: 1847) p. 16.]

Knowing and Loving

In fact it is knowing that causes love and gives birth to it. It is not possible to attain love of anything that is beautiful without first learning how beautiful it is. Since this knowledge is sometimes very ample and complete and at other times imperfect, it follows that the philtre of love has a corresponding effect. Some things that are beautiful and good are perfectly known and perfectly loved as befits so great beauty. Others are not clearly evident to those who love them, and love of them is thus more feeble. 

[Nicholas Cabasilas, The Life in Christ, DeCatanzaro, tr. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press (Crestwood, NY: 1974) p. 89.]

Tuesday, June 09, 2026

God and Tribal Deities

 It's interesting to think about how the Old Testament regards the various deities of tribes around the Israelites. 

The Canaanites worshipped El, and the Scriptures make no distinction at all between the Lord (YHWH) and El. It's unclear how much to make of this, since 'El' eventually became the generic word for any high God in the area, but we can say straightforwardly that there is no sign that the Israelites ever had any problem with the worship of El, considered on its own.

The Edomites worshipped Qos (or Qaus or Koze), and there is also no sign of any animosity toward Qos in Scripture, despite the fact that the Israelites were regularly interacting with Edomites; the name only even comes up twice for sure (and then only in the name Barqos: Ezra 2:53, Nehemiah 7:55), and possibly it might underlie the very difficult-to-interpret Hebrew of Proverbs 30:31 (which we usually translate as 'king with his host', but might originally have read 'Qos with the king'). There are a few old inscriptions (from Kuntillet Ajred) that possibly refer to Qos as "YHWH of Teman", so some people have suggested that they were just seen as the same. Others have suggested that Qos might not have been a name but a title. There's a lot we don't know here, but again it's interesting that worship of Qos wasn't seen as an issue by any of the Jewish prophets. (The first sign of any trouble over between Jews and Edomite worshippers of Qos is in the Hasmonean period, when the Hasmoneans cracked down on Edomite worship, but that seems to have been a cultic crack-down arising for political reasons.)

Three local tribal deities are firmly and repeatedly rejected in Scripture: Ashtoreth (Attartu/Astarte), Chemosh (Kamosh), and Milcom (Milkam). They are explicitly stated to be foreign and their worship is said to be offensive to the Lord. Milkam was worshipped by the Ammonites, and we know almost nothing about him; he is referred to in Scripture as 'desolation' and 'abomination'. We have a few seals that associate Milkam with bulls and maybe the stars. He might be the same as Moloch, although we don't know for sure.

We know a bit more about Kamosh. He was worshipped by the Moabites; the Moabites were Canaanites, but there seems reason to think that they had a very distinctive worship. In Moabite inscriptions, Kamosh is associated with the planet Venus, the morning star, and the Semitic deity Attar. Although it is limited, there is definitely evidence that his worship involved human sacrifice, at least under specific conditions (like war), and that the Moabite worship may have actively involved appealing to him for curses. In later days, the Greeks associated him with Ares, and he may well have had similar brutal characteristics, since he does seem to have been a war-god. Scripture also refers to him as 'abomination'.

Ashtoreth, of course, is the foreign 'abomination' we know most about. She was a goddess, and she is always the consort of another god. So this is obviously one major strike against her: she is the guarantor of polytheism. If you worship her, you definitely worship multiple gods. She may be very, very old, since the Phoenicians almost certainly inherited her from the Akkadians and perhaps also the Eblaites, who formed one of the first organized kingdoms in the area. The Greeks associated her with Aphrodite, and it used to be thought that she was a fertility goddess, but actually this seems not to have originally been the case, and evidence of association with the explicitly erotic (e.g., temple prostitution) seems scattered and occasional, and perhaps mostly linked to Byblos and to Carthage. She's definitely associated with ships, lions, horses, and hunting. She may have been a war goddess, and in fact this might be one link between the three rejected deities -- they may be war gods whose worship involved abominable activities of various kinds in the name of war. Ashtoreth is often associated in Scripture with war, directly or indirectly, as when the Phoenicians put their war trophies in the temple of Ashtoreth. She is also regularly associated with Baalim.

Baal is not a single deity. The word is Canaanite for 'Lord', and different cities seem to have had each a Baal of that city. The earliest parts of Scripture don't seem all that hostile to Baal; it seems to be treated as just a divine title, and the Israelites may themselves have sometimes used it of their own God, if theophoric names and divine epithets are to be taken as evidence (e.g., Psalm 68:4 calls God 'cloud-rider', which was also an epithet of Hadad, the most influential local Baal). As time goes on, however, 'Baal' as a divine title becomes treated with greater and greater hostility in the Scriptural narrative. Since there are many Baalim and Scripture does not distinguish them, we don't always know which is meant, but there is strong evidence that the rejection of Baal is associated with two Baalim in particular: Hadad and Melqart, who are sometimes identified with each other. In any case, the Baal that was introduced into Israel by King Ahab and Queen Jezebel, and with whose worshippers the prophet Elijah kept struggling was almost certainly Hadad or Melqart. Melqart is associated with the Phoenician cities of Tyre and Carthage (although the chief Baal of Carthage was Hammon rather than Melqart). The Greeks associated him with Heracles. Beyond this, we don't know much about Melqart. Hadad, also called Rammanu/Rimmon ('the Thunderer'), was a storm god, and a very ancient one worshipped by the Akkadians and Eblaites; he is also the Baal who causes problems for El in the Ugaritic Baal Cycle.

Thus we get a full spectrum, from the accepted or at least neutral (El, Qos), to the heavily mixed (Baal), to the vehemently repudiated (Ashtoreth, Chemosh, Milcom). The two key sources of variation seem to be (1) relation to polytheism and (2) kind of worship. El, Qos, and some versions of Baal are, or seem to be, supreme deities, so it's easier to adapt their titles and names to monotheism; Ashtoreth and some versions of Baal are inherently polytheistic, and this is probably also true of Milcom and perhaps also Chemosh. Ashtoreth, Chemosh, and Milcom are associated with 'abomination' in worship, however that is understood, and the same may well be true of Hadad, at least in the version introduced into Israel. Thus worship of them made you directly complicit with evils.

Of course, all of this is really quite patchy. We can infer a fair amount about Baal Hadad and Ashtoreth, and to a lesser extent about El, because their worship was ancient and widespread, with lots of fragments of information about them across a long spread of time, but the evidence we get about even them is often limited and confused, and at times outright confusing. About the rest, we know considerably less, and even our best guesses are often not much more than guesses. Much of what we think we know for any of them could very well be upended with one good archeological find.

Expressive Truth and Falsehood

 Today I learned that there is a musical version of Pride and Pejudice; in fact, there are several. The one that came to my notice is called Pride & Prejudice: A New Musical, called "A New Musical" to distinguish it from a previous P&P musical. It's rather peculiar; some aspects of the story come through, and there are genuinely funny parts, but some of the songs are absurd to the point of being grating. Part of the problem is that musicals externalize expression of emotion into music in non-subtle ways; this can be done be done well, but it causes problems when the expression is not 'true' to the characters or the story, and the problems are intensified if the original is often quite subtle, as is the case here. For instance, Elizabeth Bennett early on in P&P:ANM sings a song, "Headstrong," in which sings that she is too headstrong for a man to bear. Now, I am very certain that this is not true to Jane Austen's character. Maybe Elizabeth would suggest something as a joke, but it seems very clear that she would be quite offended if someone seriously thought that she was too headstrong for a man to endure. She sees herself as reasonable woman, and this plays an important role in her story-arc; being unmarriageable (which is what it amounts to in context) is not at all part of her self-conception. Indeed, any man who thought she was too headstrong would almost certainly be dismissed by Elizabeth as arrogant at best, and very possibly as stupid. As for Mr Darcy -- I'm not sure I can fully imagine what a musical expression of Mr Darcy should be, but it is certainly not this, and it's a very big problem if your adaptation of Pride and Prejudice cannot make sense of Mr Darcy.

Of course, part of it could be acting or musical direction rather than the material itself; these are also ways in which the music could be true or false as expressive to character. And to be wholly honest, I think even poor adaptations of P&P are worth having, if they ever increase the probability that we will have good ones.

In any case, it's a good example of the fact that emotional expression itself admits of true and false.

Monday, June 08, 2026

Habitude XXXVI

 To the second one proceeds thus. It seems that in one human being there are many original sins. For it is said in Psalm I, For behold I was conceived in iniquity, and in sins my mother conceived me. But sin in which a human being is conceived is original. Therefore there are many original sins in one human being.

Further, one and the same habitude does not incline to contraries, for habitude inclines by way of nature, which tends to one. But original sin, even in one human being, inclines to diverse and contrary sins. Therefore original sin is not one habitude, but several.

Further, original sin infects all the parts of the soul. But the diverse parts of the soul are diverse subjects of sin, as is obvious from the foregoing. Since therefore one sin is not able to be diverse subjects, it seems that original sin is not one but many.

But contrariwise is what is said in Ioan. I, Behold the lamb of God, behold he who takes away the sin of the world [peccatum mundi]. Which is said singularly because the sin of the world, which is original sin, is one; as the Gloss explains there.

I reply that it must be said that in one human being is one original sin. The reason for this is able to be taken in two ways. In one way, on the part of the cause of original sin. For it was said above that only the first sin of the first parent is handed down to posterity. Whence original sin in one human being is one in number; and in all human beings it is proportioned to one, to wit, in reference to the first source [primum principium]. In another way the reason for this is able to be taken from the essence itself of original sin. For in every disordered [inordinata] disposition, specific unity is considered on the part of the cause, but numerical unity on the part of the subject, as is obvious in corporeal illness, for there are diverse specific illnesses which proceed from diverse causes, such as superabundance of heat or cold, or from lesion of lung or liver, but one illness according to species in one human being is only one numerically. But the cause of this corrupt disposition that is called original sin is just one, namely, privation of original justice, through which subjection of the human mind to God is suppressed. And in one human being it cannot but be one, but in diverse human being it is specifically and proporationately one, but numerically diverse.

To the first, therefore, it must be said that sins are said plurally according to that custom of divine Scripture in which the plural is frequently put for the singular, as in Matth. II, They died who sought the soul of the child. Or else because in original sin all actual sins pre-exist, as in a kind of source, when it is multiple in force. Or else because in the sin of the first parent, which is handed down by origin, there were several deformities, to wit, pride, disobedience, gluttony, and suchlike other things. Or else because many parts of the soul are infected by original sin.

To the second it must be said that one habitude is not able through itself [per se] and directly, that is, through its own form, to contraries. But indirectly and incidentally [per accidens], to wit, through removing the impeding [per remotione prohibentis] nothing impedes, just as, the harmony of mixed body being dissolved, elements tend to contrary places. And likewise, the harmony of original justice being dissolved, diverse powers of soul are impelled diversely.

To the third it must be said that original sin infects diverse parts of the soul, according as they are parts of one whole, just as original justice is contained in all parts of the soul in one. And thus there is but one original sin, just as there is one fever in one human being although diverse parts of the body are affected.

[St. Thomas Aquinas, ST 2-1.82.2, my translation. The Latin is here, the Dominican Fathers translation is here.]

Sunday, June 07, 2026

Corpus Christi

  Corpus Christi 

Bread is broken on the table;
into the cup is poured the wine;
by this word the Word our Savior
becomes the substance of the sign. 

Adam's flesh from fleshly Adam
is freed from sinful flesh once more,
for we, by blood and by slain body,
are flesh and blood with Christ our Lord. 

Speak, my tongue, of His scourged body,
now blessed and broken for our race,
of pricelessness of blood now flowing
to pay our price and grant us grace. 

Sing, my voice, the song of angels
as here they wonder at his tomb,
which, with side-sprung water flowing,
encompassed us to be our womb. 

Love, my heart, the changeless ancient
who descends from God above
to be a babe and passion's patient;
He is God, for God is Love. 

Trust, my soul, in Truth most holy:
for Truth is true and does not lie.
All free from lie, from lies He freed us;
here see the sign Truth truly died! 

Hope, my spirit in your Savior,
for He is life, in dying lives,
for us is given by the Father
to be this Bread of Life we give. 

Shout, my sisters; shout, my brothers!
From on the housetops make it known
and tell the tale on every mountain
to own this well: you are His own!

Saturday, June 06, 2026

Tireless at Eve as in the Golden Noon

A June Sonnet
by Clara B. Heath

A poet were no poet if the June went by,
Year after year, and brought no tender thrill
Through all his being till his pulse ran high.
When thistle down before the wind lies still,
His gross and selfish thoughts perchance will fill
The rare June days, with summer roses nigh.
A poet may be songless! his mute lips
May answer not when Nature speaks in tune,
But rythmic numbers thro' each day-dream slips;
His fancies throng him 'neath the pure pale moon;
He soars on wings the care fiend never clips,
Tireless at eve as in the golden noon;
Prosaic reason 'neath his vision dips;--
His purple mantle wraps him close in June.

Friday, June 05, 2026

Dashed Off XV

This begins the notebook begun in March 2025.


 Before you can know the just, you must know the true.

Genuine mercy has a power of achieving good that goes beyond all our planning.

In a democracy, all politics is by group status competition.

The intelligible has two formats: natural (in itself) and intentional (in another).

What happens must be either the only possible thing, or a possibility reached without regard for what it is, or a possibility selected because of what it is.

Everything that exists is either absolutely necessary or is necessarily related to another.

causation vs causativity

Every state of affairs excludes some other state of affairs.

All salvation is both individual and communal.

There are two kinds of explanation: in terms of nature and in terms of cause, or as we might put it, in terms of the nature of the explanandum and in terms of the nature of something else.

In a letter to Bernoulli, Leibniz defines being actual as being the best of possibles (with everything having been compared). Thus, for instance, a vacuum is possible but there is none, because the existence of a vacum is not best-possible with respect to the whole.

the distinction of possible and actual as presupposing a teleology

What is possible is what is implied by the teleology of the actual.

Thought experiments can only work as thought experiments on the basis of either formal necessities or teleologies.

"In short, the object created by the poet, the poem, the painting, the symphony, is like the glory of the poet, and it is in this glory, by means of which he makes himself manifest in the world, that he makes himself manifest also to himself and becomes definitely aware, but in an inevitably imperfect and unsatisfactory manner, of his original experience." Maritain
"True civilization knows the price of human life but makes the imperishable life of man its transcendent supreme value."

immortality of soul as a postulate of civil theology (cp. Maritain)

credentialed nonachievement

Preserve the good and progress will often take care of itself, because good is diffusive of good.

We respect with our bodies and not just with our minds.

Not every kind of play is make-believe.

The argument of Parmenides 135b-c (Parmenides speaking):
If we do not admit that each has a determinate form (idea),
we deny that the idea of each is always the same,
and thus annihilate the power of reasoning (dialegesthai),
so that nothing comes of philosophy.

good by another (useful), good in itself with respect to single power or desire (pleasant), good simply to whole being (honestum)

Value implies principles of attribution.

In one sense, details are important to knowing, but in another sense, there is too much to know to always be picking at details.

Fictional characters are not merely imaginary beings, although one can form imaginary beings into fictional characters.

Trade-offs are only possible against prior standards.

the experience of there being more to experience

Every human body is structured by needs for others.

A human person is the cosmos re-represented in a particular way from a particular perspective.

In drawing, nothing is a mistake until it makes progress in the drawing impossible.

"He is near to all, yet far from all, O Nanak! He Himself remains distinct, while yet pervading all." Sri Guru Granth Sahib 276
"Each and every heart is illuminated by the Perfect Lord God." SGGS 277

We preserve a tradition by being the tradition.

Demonization is generally a sign of envy.

the notion of karma and the sense that we already have 'weight' when we come into the world

People have an aversion to the idea that there are terrible things with no one to blame.

People respect power but are rarely interested in it as such, and we see this in the fact that men and women keep giving away power to get other things.

Part of our glory is always reflection from the glory of others.

the per se prior, the per alio prior, the posterior (which is also per alio)

How we learn and how we live morally are intimately linked.

Due process requires that there be soemthing due; what is appropriate to it unfolds out of its prior obligations.

Imaginary space (and likewise imaginary time) derives from Aristotle Phys 2.4.203b; and from the mathematical character of the thing (one can posit a possible greater container for any container and a possible further element for any series). It is thus a matter of the inherent projectability of place and time (every part is inherently related to the possibility of other parts).

"It is not sufficient that a man give alms; he must also take the trouble to give them in the right way." Antonino

We must cook our experience to get knowledge, and there are many different ways to cook it.

"Institutions are empty forms when no one will sacrifice for them." Benjamin Constant
"Everything serves the intellect in its eternal search. Systems are instruments by which man discovers the truth about details while being mistaken about the whole. When the systems are superseded, truths remain."

"...the intention of the devil is to attach himself to whatever is sublime." Aquinas

Wealth inequality is part of how empires organize themselves.

Smith argues (in LJ) that polygamy harms liberty by weakening the hereditary nobility.

It is first in the hereditary nobility that people begin to understand the elements of civil right and freedom. This then gets expanded outward.

When one looks at how different physical theories handle energy, it becoems clear that in all the physical theories we have, energy is only indirectly and approximately defined.

Wis 2:12-20 as messianic prophecy

ways to handle the notion of 'nothing'
(1) bare exclusion
(2) relative exclusion
(3) contrastive representation of excluded
(4) construct on the model of being, contrasted with being itself
(5) construct on the model of being, as purely rational being

'Can you please pass the salt?' is an example of imperative-softening, in which an imperative is weakened to avoid being rude; turning imperative-form requests into interrogative-form requests is common in rather different languages (e.g., both English and Vietnamese do it), and they tend to work similarly -- the interrogative-form request recognizes that it is in the requestee's power.

Liberal societies are always tempted to treat human rights as grounded in the agreements of liberal socieites; and whenever they do, they become enemies of human rights.

If there are no natural rights, nothing is owed to human beings as such.

Sinott-Armstrong's principle of moral substitutability confuses obligatory, decisive moral reasons and moral reasons generally.

People who cannot treat their own heritage well cannot be trusted with anyone else's.

All the graces in all the Church are refractions of the fullness of grace in Christ.

"The Born Rule does not occur in ordinary classical probability theory because that theory does not include superposition events and the accompanying amplitudes (that come from representing the density matrix of a superposition event as an outer product). When superposition events are introduced into the purely mathematical theory (over the reals), then the probability of outcomes can be computed as the *squares* of the coefficients in teh normalized amplitude vector...associated with the superposition event...." David Ellerman

Asking, 'Why should I be moral?' is like asking 'Why should I be human rather than a duck?' It is nto the actual question being entertained. What is meant is, 'Why cannot I make up what is moral or moral enough, in this or that way?' or 'Why must this be the actual moral thing?' or 'What motivations is there to do this particular moral thing?'

sovereignty as a trust

Smith (Lectures on Jurisprudence) gives the principle of authority and the principle of utility (common/general interest) as the components of allegiance, but there seem others, e.g., the principle of team spirit.

Smith attributes three things to 'police power': cleanliness, security, and plenty.

injury
(1) as a man
--- --- (1a) in body
--- --- --- --- (1a1) harm to bodily integrity
--- --- --- --- (1a2) harm to physical liberty
--- --- (1b) in reputation
--- --- (1c) in estate
--- --- --- --- (1c1) real right
--- --- --- --- (1c2) personal right
(2) as a member of a family
(3) as a member of civil society
(4) as a ember of ecclesial society

Piety to the dead quite clearly extends beyond freshness of memory.

Extensive division of labor requires an already established prosperity beyond subsistence.

Probity and punctuality are essential elements in commerce.

The medievals deliberately and explicitly beat words in order to make obvious connections obvious, but were later attacked for this, because the connections were then so often verbally obvious, as deriving the connections from the words. This is one of the dangers of adapting language to a system of thought or an approach to inquiry.

"The human world is characterized by the opposition of home and alien, by a temporal dimenion and mood coloring." Patocka
"Thought and language are an explanation of human freedom, an expression of the fact taht the world is at our disposal, that we are not purely passively determined by our environment and the tendencies emerging in it, but rather actively appropriate reality and dispose of it."

"All art orders and subjugates matter to human desire, but human desire is either for goods beyond us or goods limited to ourselves, and to 'ourselves' as limited in time, power, resources, etc." James Chastek

Even while engaged in explicit thinking, we all form opinions on things in the world that we do not distinguish from givens unless we find a need to do so.

The greatest achievements of even very skilled soldiers and generals have an element of luck in them; the same is true of artists and artisans. One sign of greatness of skill or training is that the lucky is used well, and crowns the competently good with splendor.

Some things that can be doubted nonetheless cannot be avoided.

The perceiving and the perceived are one, but not one and the same.

Challenge arguments establish a threshold and so depend heavily on teh cogency of the threshold, which sets what counts as success in the challenge. The threshold has to be justifiable by the teleology of inquiry.

'Ceteris paribus' is a causal phrase.

We assess alternate possibilities with respect to a cause -- epistemic possibilities with respect to cognitive power, physical possibilities with respect to physical causes, etc.

The notion that emotion is a better expression of spirituality than ritual is a grave error.