Monday, December 05, 2011

The Nativity in Paintings III

Robert Campin - Anbetung der Hirten - ca1420

This is an early fifteenth-century painting by the Master of Flémalle, who has come to be identified with Robert Campin. Campin was something of a pioneer; he took realism in painting farther than most of his contemporaries (although, as you can see in the painting above, he also is considerably influenced by the conventions of manuscript illumination), and was one of the first to experiment with the switch from egg-based tempera to oil.

In paintings we find two major traditions for the location of the scene: the Cave or the Shed. Both are usually highly stylized, with the animal shed, for instance, often being little more than a canopy. The Nativity at Night appears to be in the Cave tradition, while the Hohenfurth painting is very definitely in the Shed tradition. Here we have a remarkably realistic, and very rickety, old animal shed; the fact that the shed is virtually falling apart does multiple duty here by creating a contrast with both the Christ Child in the foreground and the castle representing the centers of power in the background, and also by opening up more space for painting, thus allowing us to get the ox and (behind the ox) the ass.

The Cave vs. Shed option is an interesting one. Of course, when we talk about Christ in the stable, in our sense of the word, we are appealing to the Shed tradition. In fact, neither Matthew nor Luke give us any indication beyond Luke saying that there was a manger available. It could very well have been simply an adjoining room of the house dug in a little lower than the main room to keep the animals out of the latter; or, if the house was near a cave, a cave is certainly a possibility; it's unlikely to have been an out and out shed, but a sort of crude approximation to one adjoined to a house can't be wholly ruled out, either, since the word for 'manger' can also sometimes indicate an animal pen or stall.

The Cave tradition, however, seems to have the longest history; Justin Martyr in the second century states unequivocally in the Dialogue with Trypho (chapter 78) that Jesus was born in a cave just outside of Bethlehem:

Joseph took up his quarters in a certain cave near the village; and while they were there Mary brought forth the Christ and placed Him in a manger, and here the Magi who came from Arabia found Him.

And Origen writing a little bit later also states it. The Church of the Nativity itself is in this tradition: the Basilica of the Nativity (the Orthodox portion of the Church of the Nativity) is built over the Grotto of the Nativity, an underground cave that by long tradition is the place where Jesus was born, and, even if not, has for over a millenium and a half done as a proxy for it.

As far as painting goes, of course, artists will paint according to customs and times; and paintings will tend to paint Jesus as where the animals are in the culture in which the painter lives. The rise of the standalone Nativity creche has probably also given a boost to the Shed tradition since the thirteenth century, since it is easier to have a standalone stable than a standalone cave. In painting, the Shed tradition allows one to have a richer background than the Cave tradition; as with the painting above, the Shed tradition allows one to paint the Christ Child as situated within a much more vast world, while the Cave tradition instead puts greater emphasis on the foregrounded figures.

4 comments:

  1. berenike4:34 AM

    A challenge! Last year I bought some crimmers cards with no explanation of the pictures they reproduced. One is a nativity scene of (I suppose, I am vague on visual art history!) renaissancey date, with St Joseph in the centre kneeling at the manger with Our Lady on his right. I'd love to know what the picture is, but what most and particularly intrigues me is the glove hanging from St Joseph's belt - there seem to be two, only one is visible. However, it is very prominent, white on the dark blue background of St Joseph's robe, almost at the centre of the scene, and it has three fingers in total - two and a thumb. Can it be just a detail of his dress? it is so very prominent. I recall that, again last year, I came acros some reference that seemed to be connected, but of course I simply could not find it again. Have you any idea?

    (there'salso a young man in the top RH, with "Sanctus Bernhardus" written in his halo, and a scroll from his hand saying "nascentes ei claruit cristi clara nativitas", which is from a vespers hymn for St Bernard)

    Yours hopefully,

    berenike

    ReplyDelete
  2. branemrys6:35 AM

    That might be a challenge beyond my very basic knowledge. Just by your description, that sounds like it is  a peculiar painting. If St. Joseph is in the center that would usually suggest that it's part of a larger painting. And Joseph in blue is pretty rare, too; he's usually in red. I can't place it.

    The gloves are recognizable from the description, though; they are lightweight carpenter's gloves (which have missing fingers to allow more hand movement). Usually the thumb is one of the ones left uncovered, though; perhaps that's just because it's an older version than the ones typically in use today.

    ReplyDelete
  3. berenike8:18 AM

    How frustrating!

    Thanks for the glove thing - though this one has three equally-sized fingers, not any missin - doesthatstill sound like carpenter's gloves? St J hasa red cloak over his blue tunic, and has a (?wooden?) patten on his left foot (he is kneeling on his right knee).

    It's not particularly unusual, in fact, if it weren't for that glove, I'd probably not be able to tell it from a dozen others.

    Thanks for replying!

    ReplyDelete
  4. branemrys9:00 PM

    <span>this one has three equally-sized fingers, not any missin - doesthatstill sound like carpenter's gloves</span>

    I'd have to see them to be sure. Modern carpenter's gloves usually have two fingers, which is why I suggested them on the basis of your description -- it's easy to imagine that there might be variations in which the thumb or another finger was protected as well, and, of course, it would make sense for an artist to paint St. Joseph with the carpenter's version of work gloves. Other than that I don't know what they would be. Although, as we'll see in a Nativity painting I'll put up, some painters do unusual things with St. Joseph just because there are fewer requirements to meet with him than with the Virgin.

    ReplyDelete

No anonymity (but consistent pseudonyms allowed). Abusive comments, especially directed toward other commenters, will be deleted; abusive commenters will be hunted down and shot. By posting a comment you agree to these terms and conditions.

Please understand that this weblog runs on a third-party comment system, not on Blogger's comment system. If you have come by way of a mobile device and can see this message, you may have landed on the Blogger comment page; your comments will only be shown on this page and not on the page most people will see, and it is much more likely that your comment will be missed (although I do occasionally check to make sure that no comments are being overlooked).