Saturday, November 09, 2024

Euripides, Medea; Hippolytus; Helen

 Introduction

Opening Passages: From Medea (not counting the translator-added stage instructions):

NURSE. How I wish the Argo never had reached the land
Of Colchis, skimming through the blue Symplegades,
Nor ever had fallen in the glades of pelion
The smitten fir-tree to furnish oars for the hands
Of heroes who in Pelias's name attempted
The Golden Fleece! For ten my mistress Medea
Would not have sailed for the towers of the land of Iolcos,
Her heart on fire with passionate love for Jason;
Nor would she have persuaded the daugthers of Pelias
To kill their father, and now be living here
In Corinth with her husband and her children.... (p. 26)

From Hippolytus (not counting stage instructions):

APHRODITE. Strong am I among mortals, not without a name,
the goddess Cypris, who in heaven too is known.
And of those who live and look upon the light of the sun
from Pontus to the boundaries that Atlas set,
I give honour to the ones who reverence my power,
and those whose thoughts of me are arrogant I crush. (p. 78)
From Helen (not counting stage instructions):

HELEN. These are the shining virgin streams of the river Nile
who, with the white snow melting, takes the place of rain
from heaven and waters all of Egypt's level fields.
Proteus was, while he lived, the ruler of this land
King of Egypt, though he lived in Pharos' isle.
He for his wife took one of the numphs of the sea,
Psamanthe, who had once been the wife of Aiacus. (p. 131)

Summary: In Medea, we find Jason and Medea settled in Corinth with their young children, years after their fateful meeting during the quest of the Golden Fleece. Just before the beginning of the play, however, Jason came to an agreement with the ruler of Corinth, Kreon, for Jason to marry Kreon's daughter, Glauce.  Medea, fiery in temperament due to being the granddaughter of the Sun, is in a raging fury over it. Hearing of Medea's threats against Glauce, Kreon, and Jason, Kreon comes to her to inform her that she will be exiled. Medea, however, begs him to give her one day to make arrangements; he notes that he is likely making a mistake, but he grants it to her out of mercy for her children. Jason comes to Medea next, in order to promise her that he will make provision for her and the children, and to try to explain himself. Jason argues that she fails to appreciate her true position, how she was brought from a barbarian land to Greek civilization; he has not agreed to the marriage in order to have another woman but in order to gain the political protections for himself and the children that would come with such a marriage, and he hoped, and still hopes, that over time the two families would be united together properly, the children of his wife, Glauce, and the children of his mistress, Medea simply dismisses him as a coward. Medea then meets an old friend, Aigeus, the king of Athens, and gets a promise from him that if she can make it on her own to Athens, he will provide protection for her and her children.

The preliminaries all done, Medea springs her plan into action. Convincing Jason to lend his support, she sends her children with a robe and a coronet to Glauce, purportedly to ask Kreon to spare the children from exile. They turn out to be poisoned with a terrible poison, and Glauce dies soon after she puts it on; Kreon also dies trying in desperation to tear the robe off of his screaming daughter. Medea then kills her children. Jason attempts to confront her, but Medea has a trump card; she rises above the house, which she has set on fire, in a chariot from her grandfather Helios. Saved by the deus ex machina -- which, in a remarkable twist, is herself -- she is entirely out of his reach, and escapes to Athens.

We are inclined to take Jason's defense of his actions as mere bluster, and certainly he is trying to spin the situation; but I think it's important to recognize that within the framework of the story, Jason is not obviously wrong. Their position in Corinth is precarious, and being on Kreon's good side is seen to be essential, given that Kreon can exile anyone he pleases. But he has also, as Medea's exit shows, meddled in divine things, crossing a boundary that was not his to cross. Ironically, it is Kreon's willingness to show mercy that leads to the deaths of his daughter and himself; he falsely thought that Medea could not be a serious threat in only a day. In the end, in fact, none of the Greeks really understood the powers with which they were dealing; they saw in Medea a barbarian woman with a reputation as a witch, and thus utterly underestimated the real power Medea held. 

In Hippolytus we find ourselves in Troezen, where Theseus is enduring a temporary exile with his son Hippolytus. Aphrodite tells us that Hippolytus has sworn himself to chastity in devotion to Artemis and spurned her interests, and that she is bringing disaster upon him. Phaedra, Theseus's wife and Hippolytus's stepmother, is in Athens, and when Hippolytus previously visited her, Aphrodite made her subject to a powerful and overmastering passion for him. Recognizing this as wrong, Phaedra is attempting to starve herself to death to avoid disgracing herself. Phaedra's nurse attempts to rectify the situation by telling Hippolytus of the problem, but this is what precipitates the disaster. Ashamed that her secret is known, Phaedra hangs herself. Theseus on his return to Athens discovers her body and a letter on it accusing Hippolytus of raping her. Theseus is furious; he has received from his father, Poseidon, the power to apply three terrible curses to anyone he wishes, and he uses one of them against Hippolytus. Hippolytus protests his innocence, but Theseus sends him to exile. He is barely even out of the city when the curse takes effect, and a bull roars out of the sea, violently startling his horses so that Hippolytus is fatally wounded. At the end, Artemis appears to Theseus and tells him that Hippolytus was innocent and fated to die by Aphrodite; no god can interere with the firm purpose of another god, but she will revenge herself by harming one of Aphrodite's favorites. The dying Hippolytus has his last meeting with his father, forgiving him, and thus it all ends.

In Helen, Helen is in Egypt, having been whisked away by the goddess Hera, who replaced her with an eidolon. The idol-Helen was the Helen for whom the Trojan War was taught; Helen, meanwhile, has been stuck in Egypt, powerless to change the fact that her name everywhere is that of an adulteress responsible for endless deaths. The king of Egypt who had protected her, Proteus, has recently died and been replaced by his son, Theoclymenus, who intends to marry Helen and has a policy of killing any Greek man on sight. A man named Teucer happens to come to Egypt and gives Helen news of the Trojan War. I find it fascinating that he's the character who is chosen to give Helen this news. The Trojan War was especially brutal for Teucer; he was related to people on both sides, being the half-brother of Ajax on the Greek side and the nephew of King Priam on the Trojan side. He was particularly successful, killing at various times at least twenty of the top Trojan heroes, and narrowly avoided being killed by his cousin Hector twice. The Trojan War was brutal for everyone, but no one knew the brutality of it better than Teukros. From Teucer, Helen learns that Menelaus and his wife Helen have vanished; they may well be dead. She also learns that her brothers, Castor and Pollux have either become gods or committed suicide. We see here one of the fascinating things about the play -- all the major characters have a double story. Helen both is and is not guilty of precipitating the Trojan War; Menelaus both has and has not reclaimed her; Helen's brothers both are and are not gods. Theoclymenus's sister, Theonoe, is a prophetess; Helen goes to see her to learn the fate of Menelaus.

Menelaus and idol-Helen meanwhile have shipwrecked nearby and Menelaus learns from an old woman, to his astonishment, that there is someone living there who claims to be Helen. This is literally incredible to him, but everything he learns about her matches up. Helen meanwhile has learned from Theonoe that Menelaus is still alive, and while she is wishing for him to come to her, they run into each other. They cannot deny each other's resemblance to their spouse, but it's an easier sell for Helen, who has just had divine word that he is alive, than for Menelaus, who has just left his wife sheltering in cave after having been journeying with her since the end of the war he fought to retrieve her. Menelaus's final word as he turns to leave is interesting:

MENELAUS. My sufferings at Troy convince me. You do not.

Menelaus has literally suffered to reclaim Helen at Troy; many great Greek and Trojan warriors died in the attempt to reclaim Helen at Troy; the Greeks found themselves at times contesting with gods to reclaim Helen at Troy; so, regardless of how she looks and sounds, regardless of what people say, regardless of how many baffling mysteries are left in the air, how can Helen possibly have been in Egypt the entire time? Having made his choice, Menelaus begins to return to idol-Helen, but fortunately for him the gods are not quite done messing with events, as a messenger meets him with the astounding news that idol-Helen has ascended into the sky after having told everyone that she was not the real Helen. This is about as good a proof as one could get of such strange events, so Menelaus returns to Helen.

Interestingly, this is not the end of the story, because Menelaus and Helen have to escape from Egypt. Helen actually tries to get Menelaus to flee, since Theoclymenus will kill him if he learns that he is in the land, but Menelaus refuses. Instead, they swear to live and die together. Since death seems the only option left to them, they consider how to face their deaths. But Theonoe meets them and, of course, knows immediately what the situation is. The problem Theonoe faces is that she too has a double story of sorts. Hera wishes Menelaus and Helen to return home together. Aphrodite opposes their return. She has an obligation to her brother to tell him of the situation, but this would lead to their deaths. Since she knows what will happen, her choice is the one that will decide matters: either she must rule for Hera and against her brother and Aphrodite, or for her brother and Aphrodite but against Hera. She is inclined to tell her brother, but Helen begs her in the name of justice, and Menelaus in the name of honor, and she agrees to cast her vote for Hera and hope that Aphrodite will be satisfied with prayer. What she does not tell them, but certainly knows, is that by doing so she has agreed to her own death, because her brother will certainly put her death when he finds out, which he will.

Now protected from discovery for a time, Helen and Menelaus form a plan. Helen tells Theoclymenus that a messenger arrived bringing news of the death of her husband at sea. She will marry him, but before she can do so, she must symbolically bury him at sea, so that despite the circumstances, funeral rites may be properly done; she'll do that with the help of the 'messenger', who is Menelaus himself. Theoclymenus agrees, but, of course, now that they have a boat, the two escape. Theoclymenus realizes what must have happened and tries to order his sister's execution. His servants balk somewhat at this, risking their own lives, but before things can spiral out of hand, Helen's brothers, Castor and Pollux, appear as gods, and, faced with divine revelation that he should neither pursue Helen nor kill his sister, Theoclymenus is at least intelligent enough to concede. His concession speech perhaps indicates that his concession is a bit grudging:

THEOCLYMENUS. ... Let me rejoice with you in Helen's noble mind,
a thing that in most women is not found at all. (p. 192)

With the interference of The Twins, the double stories finish snapping back into one final story. Helen is innocent. Menelaus has his wife. Castor and Pollux are gods. Theonoe fulfilled her responsibilities. The play is a tragedy. But the tragedy is what was there all along, in the double paths, which brought endless suffering; resolved back to one, Menelaus and Helen have come through to the other side. For now, at least. As Euripides always reminds us, you can never tell with the gods. If there's one thing that the tales teach us, it is that the gods are never giving us the story we think they are giving us.

Favorite Passage:

HELEN. And are the sons of Tyndarus alive or not?

TEUCER. Alive and not alive. There are two stories here.

HELEN. Which is most likely? [aside] Oh, the pain that I go through.

TEUCER. The brothers are made gods, they say, and turned to stars.

HELEN. Good news indeed! What does the other story say?

TEUCER. That for her sister's sake they stabbed themselves and died.... (pp. 135-147)

Recommendation: Highly Recommended, all. If I had to rank them, I would rank Medea as most recommended, followed by Helen (I was very impressed this reading by the handling of the double-story theme), then Hippolytus. But these are fine distinctions.

*****

Euripides, Three Great Plays of Euripides, Rex Warner, tr., (Meridian: 1994).

Links of Note

 * Jake Meador, Against Syncretism, for Christians Building like Christians, at "Mere Orthodoxy"

* Evan O'Donnell, Aenesidemus Was Not an Academic (PDF)

* Enrico Terrone, On Fictional Characters as Types (PDF)

* Brian Klaas, The forces of chance, on chaos theory and social sicences, at "Aeon"

* Alva NoĆ«, Rage against the machine, on AI, at "Aeon"

* Miren Boehm, Hume's Definitions of 'Cause': Without idealizations, within the bounds of science (PDF)

* Vasiliki Christopoulou and Theodore Arabatzis, Control Strategies in the Discovery of Argon, at "Jargonium" (a blog for history and philosophy of chemistry)

* Robert Lawrence Kuhn, A landscape of consciousness: Toward a taxonomy of explanations and implications

* Thomas M. Osborne, The Good as Telos in Cajetan, Banez, and Zumel (PDF)

* Marcel Weber, Modeling the Biologically Possible: Evolvability as a Modal Concept (PDF)

* Clare Coffey, The Natural History of Prayer, at "Plough"

* Patrick Flynn, From Necessary Being to God: Why the Gap Problem Doesn't Exist for Classical Theists, at "The Journal of Absolute Truth"

* Ryan Miller, The Irreducibility of Chemistry to Everettian Quantum Mechanics (PDF)

* Jeroen Boeterse, Otto Neurath and the things that unite us, at "3 Quarks Daily"

Friday, November 08, 2024

Dashed Off XXV

 Every measurement involves a division of possibilities and an exclusion of some of those possibilities as divided.

Parents, having the primary duty to care for children, have the primary responsibility and power to take steps to ensure that they can fulfill that duty.

Every right establishes permissions, exemptions, and responsibilities. Every liberty establishes rights.

Law is an expression of the person and reflects the nature of the person.

The social ontology in which the eucharist is a memorial is a divine social ontology, not merely a human one, or even an ecclesiastical one.

the power of law as one of mhumanity's major survival capabilities

being -- creation -- life
truth -- illumination -- wisdom
goodness -- providence -- love
beauty -- culmination -- blessedness

life as higher-order power; power over powers

There is not a separate pactum for every sacrament, so what the pactum (Old Covenant / New Covenant) undergirds is a general sacramental efficacy, for minor and major sacraments alike, as occurring within the terms of the covenant.

Maintaining a memorial before the Lord is not a matter of reminding God but continuing to connect ourselves to what God remembers.

power -- power over power (life) -- epistemic power (light) -- deontic power (law)

Christ's giving of the keys to the apostles as a moral, jural, and sacral act

restoration of tradition
(1) education (commemoration, re-enactment)
(2) preservation practices
(3) scholarly reconstruction
(4) practical extrapolation
(5) salvage restoration
(6) reversal of destructive practices
(7) reservation for rewilding

Christian life as a study of the good

fraternitarian liberalism

the lay juror as a major contributor to the understanding of 'reasonable person' in law
-- what counts as reasonable under law has to be intelligibly consistent with what jurors take to be reasonable

In anything tha thas a genuine way it ought to be, it is impossible entirely to separate what it is and what it ought to be; this follows from the problem-solving character of 'ought'.

All social phenomena involve moral facts.

Every genuine rule of recognition will require that law be intelligible as law to a rational person, in order to be recognized as valid.

No legal system ever stops being based on custom.

It seems obvious that every legal system in actual use has multiple rules of recognition that are used in different contexts and coordinate only in imprecise and ever-changing ways.

Sovereignty is a matter of offices, and only indirectly of rules or habits.

Etiquette quite clearly contains secondary rules as much as law does.

As laws are for purposes, all laws have a basic dependency on their merit in fulfilling their purposes; law must at least be such that legislatures, executives, and courts regard it as having at least some merit for fulfilling its purposes.

Hart's positivism doesn't actually seem to be able to distinguish law and official etiquette (protocol); the conception his followers have of the latter is obviously defective, and everything Hart actually says about law apply with little modification to etiquette of officials.

Every known legal system has to accommodate legal entities older and more entrenched than itself.

law & the importance of contingent specifications of generic necessities

Rosmini's Theodicy & the desiderata for a legal system

Legal systems are often layers of systems.

knows vs presumptively knows (K -> T applies to first but not strictly to second)
'presumptively knows' as imply K if no defective causes

romantic attachment and the sense of novelty
-- this seems the kernel of truth in the adage 'opposites attract'

The means by which Judaism survived the first century we find already being formed centuries before they were required.

A world in which a rational being can exists is a rational world.

To say that testimony is insufficient to establish something is to say that reason is incapable of assessing it; testimony is communicated reason.

The research university model does not prioritize research but academic product; the connection of this product to research is entirely a matter of custom and social pressure.

Every particular truth is a symbol and sign of what is simple, immutable, and eternal.

Every particular truth expresses a general kind of goodness and beauty.

survivor's guilt as a byproduct of human withness and mutual investment, the co-personality of the human person

Dedication often approximates talent.

laws of nature as principles of natural classification (cp to best systems account)

Kant on freedom & dominion as an expression of the image of God

the basic lordliness of the human person

The power of the pawn is to organize the board.

Sloth often results in destructive repetitions.

King, priest, and prophet as reflecting aspects of the divine: sovereignty, sanctity, and providence.

We get the distinction between miracles & nonmiracles from testimony, not experience.

In philosophical inquiry, the obstacle is often the way.

Arguments using possibilities are always elimination arguments without strict and permanent elimination.

relief as an aesthetic response

stories & esp. movies as means of isolating out (relatively speaking) various combinations of aesthetic responses

A state must recognize the dignity of causality of the citizens it serves.

Our tool use is an extension of our sociality; we bring the physical world into our social circle.

Our power to repent is our power to die, in moral form.

Thursday, November 07, 2024

Alas, with Empty Hands

 Sonnet to the Harvest Moon
by William Stanley Roscoe 

Again thou reignest in thy golden hall,
 Rejoicing in thy sway, fair queen of night!
 The ruddy reapers hail thee with delight,
 Theirs is the harvest, theirs the joyous call
 For tasks well ended ere the season's fall.
 Sweet orb, thou smilest from thy starry height,
 But whilst on them thy beams are shedding bright,
 To me thou com'st o'ershadow'd with a pall:
 To me alone the year hath fruitless flown,
 Earth hath fulfill'd her trust thro' all her lands,
 The good man gathereth now where he had sown,
 And the great master in his vineyard stands;
 But I, as if my task were all unknown,
 Come to his gates, alas, with empty hands.

Wednesday, November 06, 2024

Shiftings

 It's always interesting in a Presidential election year that people treat the Presidency as the most important office, and analyze the U.S. election entirely in terms of it. It's true that the Office of the President is the single most powerful office held by an individual, and that a strong Presidential candidate can boost candidates of the same party (and vice versa), but the most important result of Election Day is the new disposition of Congress. 2024 was a very bad election year for the Democrats, and it was not the election of Trump but the fact that they have certainly lost the Senate  (which was mostly expected) and it is (at this point) very likely that they have lost the House. They had better hope for the as-yet-indeterminate House elections to break unexpectedly Democratic, because that is the only thing that would prevent the night being an entire disaster from them. (Even if the unexpected happen, the best they seem to be able to hope for is an unstable bare majority.) To lose one of the Presidency, the Senate, or the House is a misfortune; to lose all three in a single election is a sign of carelessness.

Here in Texas one of the primary issues, without any doubt, was border control. I noted years ago here that, whatever one's personal preferences on immigration, the actual infrastructure in Texas for providing necessary and useful services to immigrants was already being strained to the breaking point, as, for instance, refugee services were struggling with the problem of what to do when they ran through their entire year's budget in a matter of months. We have long since passed the breaking point, with no repair at all in sight. It has been interesting over the past eight years to see Democratic candidates swing from being fairly negative on border control, to carefully neutral, to this year's continual, desperate attempts to convince people that they would be stricter on border control than the Republicans. Over and over one would see political ads by Democrats highlighting the issue as their primary issue. None of it would move Republicans, of course, but that was very clearly not the purpose of many of the ads; they were attempts to convince independents and Democrats that they would solve the problem. But it was all futile; no one really thought that the candidates had the backing of the White House or the Harris campaign on the point, and there wasn't much reason for thinking that once in office the candidates would break heavily against their own party on it. 

Just from what one hears, it seems like this was a common problem for Democratic candidates across the board; the particular issues would differ from state to state, but one repeatedly gets a sense from their political strategies that many of them felt that they were set up by Biden and Harris to fail, or, at least, that they were struggling to make headway in relative isolation. And again, to lose the Presidency is to lose a very powerful office; to lose Congress is to lose the most powerful political force in the entire world. 

In any case, as people have to keep being reminded, this is only the first phase for the Presidential election; Trump's margin is comfortable enough that he is practically guaranteed to win, but the actual election has just begun. December 11 is the deadline for the states to submit their Certificates of Ascertainment, which establish the Electors; the Electoral College will meet on December 17 actually to elect the President; they will submit their Certificates of Vote by December 25; and then Congress will count and confirm the votes on January 6.

Music on My Mind

 

"Stand by Me," Life in 3D.

Tuesday, November 05, 2024

Opposite Courses

 But man acts from judgment, because by his apprehensive power he judges that something should be avoided or sought. But because this judgment, in the case of some particular act, is not from a natural instinct, but from some act of comparison in the reason, therefore he acts from free judgment and retains the power of being inclined to various things. For reason in contingent matters may follow opposite courses, as we see in dialectic syllogisms and rhetorical arguments. Now particular operations are contingent, and therefore in such matters the judgment of reason may follow opposite courses, and is not determinate to one. And forasmuch as man is rational is it necessary that man have a free-will.

[ST 1.83.1] The "dialectic syllogisms and rhetorical arguments" part is interesting. Dialectical syllogisms and rhetorical arguments are probable inferences involving judgments that "may follow opposite courses" and are "not determinate to one" because they involve contingent particulars; therefore reason is to this extent itself a free power, and will, as following on reason as rational desire, therefore must have choice appropriate to this. Thus we have free will.

Monday, November 04, 2024

Logic as a Vector System

 In their paper, "Logic as a Vector System" (Journal of Logic and Computation 2005 15(5): 751-765), Jonathan Westphal and Jim Hardy, describe propositional logic in terms of summed displacements in space. This allows for a fairly clean presentation of some common logical rules.

Modus Ponens

premise/conclusionp  q  
p -> q -11
p10
q01

Modus Tollens

premise/conclusionp  q  
p -> q -11
~q0-1
~p-10


Disjunctive Syllogism

premise/conclusionp  q  
p v q11
~p-10
q01


Hypothetical Syllogism

premise/conclusionp  q  r  
p -> q -110
q -> r0-11
p -> r-101


Constructive Dilemma

premise/conclusionp  q  r  s  
p -> q -1100
r -> s00-11
p v r1010
q v s0101

And so forth. You will note that you can get the conclusions from the premises by adding the columns. The reason for representing rules like this is that solving logical problems becomes vector addition in mathematics -- the summed displacements represent vectors, and then you can add the vectors. You can represent each of the above tables graphically, and the paper does so. Hypothetical Syllogism, of course, requires three dimensions and Constructive Dilemma four, but this doesn't affect the way the vectors work.

We see a similar structure in Term Functor Logic, in which p -> q is represented as -p+q, etc.  TFL, of course, is mostly used for syllogisms, and can just be extended to propositional logic using analogies that have been known for well over a century and a half now. The pluses and minuses in TFL represent what in old-fashioned logical texts is called 'distribution'. But in any case, the analogies mean that Westphal's and Hardy's vectorization of propositional logic can be extended in the other direction to represent syllogisms. 


Barbara Syllogism

premise/conclusionS   M  P  
All S is M-110
All M is P0-11
All S is P-101


Sunday, November 03, 2024

Nymph of the Laughing Eye, and Sportive Mien

 Cheerfulness
by Mary F. Johnson  

Nymph of the laughing eye, and sportive mien,
In whose blithe smile exists a potent spell
To charm the spirit of the moody spleen,
And from thy circle the black fiend expel,
Come, Cheerfulness! and in my bosom dwell!
Me from disquieting emotions wean:
Teach me the tones, that, thrilling from thy shell,
Arouse the dormant joys of each dull scene;
The lighter ills of life-a countless train 
That in their bud the blooms of Pleasure blast;
That taint, on Plenty's board, the sweet repast, 
And wither Comfort with corrosive bane; --
These ills-in social scenes so thickly strown --
Where Cheerfulness presides, are ills unknown!