Our time experiences push us toward thinking about things they do not show us.
We are not merely symbol-makers but symbol-finders.
To be able to ask for the name of something requires an already vast familiarity with classification.
As far back as we can trace consistent tool-making we can trace the history of the ability to classify. (The consistency is essential here.)
To give an example one must do more than can be found in only the giving of the example.
To learn the meaning of a word is to learn the seed-crystal of infinite possible uses of the word.
Learning a new language may change the way one gardens and thereby change one's garden.
"In speculation as well as in gossip, we have some natural inclination towards the more surprising version of a story." Mary Midgley
Those meats tend to be favored in barbecue that are rich in fats and also have a strong distinctive taste that can bear an overlay of smokiness. (Hence the prevalence of cow and pig.)
Boo and hooray derive from our evaluations and do not ground them; in saying them we express an evaluation already made.
A divorce of philosophy and poetry causes problems for moral motivation.
We always learn languages by playing games.
There once was a critic of Thomism
who said, This is nothing but Rome-ism!
Though I never know why
the thing will not die
and it eats up my own view, Coxcomb-ism.
Great poets can survive having manifestos, but it always ruins lesser poets.
What we value structures what we regard as dangerous.
Humean psychology as what it would be like to live in a dream: wandering in images of experience held loosely together by the lingering associations from how they were associated in experience, nothing of substance, nothing of causation except custom and anticipation of imagination, appearance of reality maintained by coherences and constancies and the momentum and mistake of the mind
To have and apply a concept of reality or the real world, we must contrast things with dream, fiction, hallucination, etc. To make this comparison, however, there must be something that it is to be, there must be something 'true in a dream', 'true in fiction', etc.; otherwise there would be nothing allowing the comparison and contrast.
qualia as a crude way of talking about 'way of being true in experience', a substet of 'way of being true'
signs as interfaces between ways of being true -- e.g., testimony of what is true in one's experience
dream as natural version of Rimbaud's derangement of senses
Physicists work with both 'truth in a model' and 'truth in the physical world', and the relations between these need more elucidation.
Wittgensteinianism is just a preculiar form of seeking clear and distinctinct ideas by using a method doubt.
that which cannot be merely true in a model
transcendental arguments as movements from one truth domain to a more fundamental truth domain
Reasoning on the basis of testimony requires that there be a fact of the matter about whether a person is honest or lying, and that this fact not be a matter of appearances or reputation only.
Many of the features of fiction are also found in other domains in which we have nonsystematic evidence about something to which we lack direct access.
Reading up on the Zimbabwean Hyperinflation Crisis is like seeing a tornado lift a mountain and drop it on an overflowing dam; it is an economic disaster that begins to approach something like sublimity.
Some kinds of etiquette are higher and more sacred than any artificial protocol.
Follow back any social construction and you hit something natural that makes the features of that social construction possible and salient.
Even very intelligent and social beasts don't place the weight on suffering in their actions and responses that human beings do. Humans often don't experience suffering (their own or others) as just bad but as wrong, what ought not to be, as a defect in the way things are. We are, as far as we can tell, the only animals that do this consistently and certainly the only ones that keep doing it when only remembering or imagining it.
Companonionable silence is itself a sort of conversation.
household as grex, as group, as society
There are many moral obligations to which we have to learn to be committed.
an allegorical reading of Deuteronomy 20:19-20: When engaged in religious or apologetic argument, do not attack the good things in your opponent's position, because your dispute is not against what they get right, but instead distinguish out the things that are not valuable in this way, and by demolishing them build your own position against theirs, until you have achieved the point.
We inquire by creating domains of truth to compare with other domains of truth.
sufficient reason as involving three things: adequacy, reason, and Box (the mode under which adequacy and reason are linked for sufficient reason)
We learn about ourselves by defeating ourselves.
Parliaments increased prosperity by aligning legislative interests with protection of property rights and expansion of tax capacity.
Every society requires, if it is to survive, small bits of shareable beauty.
Because of the unity of virtues, you can in principle start with any virtue and develop an account of all the virtues, and such developments from different starting points will converge (although not always in straightforward ways). But not all virtues are equally valuable as the starting seed for virtue ethics. The best are those that are themselves inherently architectonic (like prudence or justice) or pedagogical (like filial piety or respect).
We uplift ourselves with poetry, stabilize ourselves with ritual, and for the culmination express ourselves with art.
In virtue the heart goes upward.
Inferior authority cannot rid itself of trying to appear authoritative.
Authority is what maintains what emerges from the ways of things.
Many criticisms of capitalism are really identifying weaknesses in democracy, but as people don't want to attack democracy, they find a scapegoat, with the result that they do not fortify democracy against its weaknesses; they have convinced themselves that if the scapegoat is destroyed, the weaknesses will vanish.
(pure being -> pure act) -> pure spirit
As actuality is the precondition for possibility, and some possibilities are necessarily so, there must be necessary being.
Ps 118:16-17 Vulg: The right hand of the Lord (the Holy Spirit) has wrought virtue (infused virtue); I shall not die but I shall live.
Amends are sometimes of greater value than punishment.
For there to be a community of nations, there must be a community of reason, structured by common rational principles and obligations.
All human beings are thrust into a discipline of service and obedience, and therefore can only come to rest in a discipline of service and obedience prior to and more fundamental than all others.
Everybody seems reasonable on the occasions that they accidentally make a reasonable argument.
If God judged man even with an imperfect but just man's standard, not many would stand.
We treat people as projecting an intentional structure and this intentional structure is part of our assessment of their actions.
"People do not suspect what does not appear to be hidden." Maurice LeBlanc, The Crystal Stopper
Every idea dropped into the sea of humanity mutates.
Reading is a discipline in structuring one's thoughts.
The 'obligation to obey the law' is not a single obligation.
All beneficiaries have a moral obligation to requite their benefactors.
To be grateful only for things requiring special effort or sacrifice is to be an ingrate. To refuse to be grateful for a benefit until it has tbeen established to have been intentional or voluntary is also to be an ingrate.
Obeying the law is not an adequate return for benefits received from civil society, much less any kind of uniquely suitable return, but where it is interpreted in a way reasonably consistent with common good, it is usually a necessary condition for some of what is necessary for a suitable and adequate return.
People are often grateful to institutions, like schools or churches or militaries.
The heart of grateful response is not attitude but active relationship. Neither goodwill nor respect nor gratitude are reducible to attitudes.
A very general sort of indebtedness, in particular and very distinctive situations, often spawns very specific debts.
Obligations of gratitude range from minor to extremely strong; it is not possible to be a grateful person and assume that this will not ever require significant sacrifice.
The stringency of gratitude obligations do not only vary with the sacrifice or effort behind the benefit, but also the extent and importance of the benefit.
Actions performed from gratitude are no more necessarily caught up in feeling grateful than actions performed from love; indeed, in both cases, adequate action often requires the action to stretch or extend farther or longer than the feeling can.
People often treat obedience to the law as part of 'giving back' to their society and often justify disobedience on the basis of society not giving them anything that would give them reason to obey.
M-T pronoun pattern: Across Eurasia , many otherwise unrelated languages have first-person pronouns beginning with M (or close equivalent) and second-person pronouns beginning with T (or close equivalent).
N-M pronoun pattern: Across the Americas (especiall the western coast), otherwise unrelated languages have first-person pronouns beginning with N (or close equivalent) and second-person pronouns beginning with M (or close equivalent).
-- The most obvious explanation is that these are relics of a common ancestry so far back there is no other known specific trace of it.
-- Another possible explanation is that this is actually due to convergence due to 'pronominal resonance' (Johannes Nichols) -- i.e., pronoun sets tend toward alliteration and rhyme, so languages tend to shift toward being more like those with more consistent alliteration (e.g., Turkish shift in first-person pronouns from B to M).
-- M-T families tend to be consistent with the Altaic hypothesis.