Monday, September 07, 2026

Fire Serpent and Water Mountain II

 Previous


Chapter Two: The Terror of the Gods Returns to The City of the Gods 

 The rest of the summer after the visit of the gods settled into ordinary routines as the borrowed servants were sent back with generous compensations and the Hall of the Fire Serpent became quiet and empty again. Every so often, Ioan, the young forester's boy, would drop by for a game of hide and seek, or Tera would spend some time talking with Lyko, the somewhat older boy who drove the supply wagon up to the Hall each week, or she would let herself be fussed over by Deyavara, the old charwoman who came up with Lyko each week to look after various housekeeping matters, as she had done for all of Tera's life at the Hall.

 Uncle Llew spent much of his time in his workshop, as he often did during summer, although they still met at meals. Sometimes too he would be away for a day, looking after business in the realm of Mizur. Tera herself, when neither Lyko nor Ioan nor Deyavara were around, buried herself in her studies; she had nightmares of reaching The City of the Gods and being shown up as an ignoramus. Flowers and fires were the current subject of study; she enjoyed both subjects more than she had enjoyed most, but she was often frustrated at herself, not feeling that she had any good grasp on either. 

"You should relax," said Uncle Llew. "Shifting fire requires a precision that can only be gained by trying and re-trying, and living things are among the most difficult things to shift, since they keep trying to reassert their preferences." 

"Even flowers?" asked Tera skeptically. 

"Especially flowers," said Uncle Llew dismissively. "Extremely stupid organisms, not at all cooperative." It was the right thing to say; his dry contempt for the cooperativeness of flowers made her laugh, and eased her worries for a while. But she felt at other times as if she must be unusually stupid, despite his firm assurances that most of the gods were much more stupid than she was. Uncle Llew was as dismissive of the rest of the gods as he was of flowers, and she did not quite trust his judgment, or prejudgment, about them.

At dinner the night before they planned to leave for their trip to The City of the Gods, Uncle Llew looked thoughtful and grave for the entire meal. The meal was especially delicious, even for Llew's cooking, so she let him be, certain that he would tell her eventually what was on his mind.

Sure enough, after the meal, he leaned back and said,  "This will be the last time for a while that we can really speak alone. The clan is making sure the house is ready, but what that means is that every servant will be a spy in someone else's employ, and most of the building will probably be filled with artificial eyes and ears." 

"Are they really that nosy?" asked Tera. 

"You have no idea," said Llew. "I am understating it. The City runs on gossip and the family politics of the Davnan run on information. And I am a particularly interesting target for curiosity. For the most part, we will simply have to assume that every conversation is overheard. Given Oracle, we cannot even trust the chariot once we are on our way. So anything we need to discuss privately needs to be discussed now." 

 He fell silent and said nothing else, until Tera asked, "I am assuming there is something that does need to be discussed privately?" 

"Yes," said Uncle Llew, sighing. "I am sorry. It is a difficult topic for me. I have not talked about it with anyone for nearly a thousand years, and the last time, your mother and I had a very serious argument about it. But the story will likely color how others react to us, so you need to know it. 

"I suppose the point at which to begin was that there was a longstanding feud between our family and one of the Wenovar families; it was a minor feud, mostly bickering. But then came Mael Four-Dury, who became the Wenovar representative on the Crew, which oversees The City of the Gods, and, as the Wenovar in those days held the captaincy, he became Captain. He was a charming, persuasive man who carried people before him; he was also ruthless and cruel, and he escalated the feud until your mother and I came home one day and found our parents poisoned. 

"Poisoning a Davnan is not an easy task; if we can survive it, we will, so it needs considerable care and forethought. It cannot be done accidentally, and it was obvious to us who had done it. But the gods are cowards," Llew said with some bitterness, "and what they most want is not to be bothered. So they attempted to look the other way and pretend that it was merely some natural tragedy. 

"Your mother and I were not quiet about it, so Mael tried to kill us, as well. That was his fatal mistake. The whole thing broke out into a brutal war. Mael had managed the matter quite well; many people did not believe at first, and he was a persuasive and manipulative man. The Embiadwe clan stood with us, but only because we were clan; the other four clans were against us. They no doubt thought that the Embiadwe would surrender in short order. 

"What actually happened was that we had many more resources than they knew, and our clan brought the other four to their knees. I killed Mael and his accomplices myself." 

He was quiet for some minutes, then said, "We would have won, but at the last moment a number of the other Embiadwe families struck a deal with the other clans: hostilities would cease, the Embiadwe rather than the Wenovar would receive the captaincy, and in exchange your mother and I would be exiled for a hundred years. Your mother and I could not agree on what we should do in response, so we left and never returned." He sighed again. "In any case, Davnan memories are long, and there is bad blood between me and almost every family in The City, with nearly a thousand years of non-reconciliation. But now we are going to see if some reconciliation is still possible, for your sake. You should not have to deal with all the consequences of decisions made by your mother and I. I have something I want to give to you." 

He held out a pendant on a chain and she took it; the pendant was a pair of wings, connected by a gem, under which in very fine engraving was the symbol for Metal Sun, her mother's emblem-name. " Your mother wore it when she was a little girl. I found it not long ago; I am not even sure why I have it, but it is fortuitous. It is a cleverly made little thing; if you are wearing it, it will prevent some -- not all, but some -- forms of eavesdropping, and there is little lever here around the gemstone -- " -- he took it from her and showed her, a little bit of metal that curved around the side, and then gave it back -- "and if you pull the lever down while wearing it, it will alert me that you are in trouble. I hope you never have to use it, but we can never tell." She put it around her neck.

"All of this is to say, of course," said Llew, "that things will be awkward, and caution is always in order, as long as we are in The City of the Gods."

"I will be careful," said Tera. But later she wondered if she were at all prepared.

The next morning, very early, they flew off. Tera had not flown since the day she had left Davir. She did not remember much of the experience at the time, so it was almost as if it were completely knew when the chariot rose and she looked out the hatch window as first the land, then the clouds, swiftly fell below her. It was exhilarating, it was beautiful, and it somehow made her less nervous for the future.

They were in the air for several hours, so she and Uncle Llew mostly discussed various minor things associated with her studies. As the descent approached, Uncle Llew became busy with something about the chariot controls, and Tera went back to looking at the clouds beneath them. Eventually Llew said, "We are above The City and are approaching First Landing; you should see it in a moment when we get below the cloud cover." 

What does one imagine when one hears the name, "The City of the Gods"? Tera had always imagined great spires, gleaming in the sun, adorning a vast city of alabaster and gold, busy and full of traffic, with flying chariots everywhere. The City of the Gods was nothing like this. There were no spires. There was no alabaster and gold, nor any traffic of chariots. In fact, as far as Tera could see once they dropped below the clouds, there was not even any city in The City of the Gods. All she saw were mountains. To be sure, they were extraordinary mountains, beautifully rugged and forested and (in a few cases in the distance) snow-capped. Seeing them from the air was breathtaking. But there was no city. She looked and looked as Llew wove through the mountains, but it could all have been pristine wilderness for all that she could see. 

"First Landing is directly up ahead," Llew said. It took a moment but gradually she could make out a number of buildings in the valley ahead. They were not great spire-buildings, although a few were perhaps two or three stories tall. They were not densely clustered, being mostly scattered here and there in pell-mell fashion among what she could now begin to see were orchards and gardens and perhaps small farms. The closest to anything like a city was the small cluster of about a dozen buildings that they were approaching. 

"Tiny Hamlet of the Gods," said Tera aloud. "Not much of a city, is it?"

Uncle Llew laughed. "The Davnan come here to get away from what you have in mind. But you are also not thinking on a sufficiently bombastic scale. First Landing is not The City; First Landing, which is this whole valley, is one of the plazas of The City. The City covers this whole spur of the Great Mountains, running from south of First Landing to a bit beyond North Landing, forty miles to the north. Outside of First Landing, North Landing, and Great Lake Harbor, everything is divided into family estates, which of course are not piled on top of each other."

He pointed ahead. "We have to land in the Clearing; chariots are not allowed in The City, except for flying in and out." 

They touched down, opened the hatch of the chariot, and stepped out. The air was a bit cooler than it had been in Mizur, but it was fresh and clear. As Uncle Llew removed their luggage from the chariot and closed and locked it, she looked around at the beauty of the mountains rising around the valley.

"Hallo!" someone shouted. He turned out to be a man, brown-haired and with skin that was a golden tan like Uncle Llew's, perhaps a shade darker. Uncle Llew's face on seeing him set into an expressionless mask. 

"Llew!" said the man, as he came closer. 

"Amaethon," said Llew in a tone of voice that would have frozen a lake. They clasped hands briefly and kissed each other perfunctorily on both cheeks. Llew stepped back and said, "Tera, this is Amaethon Five-Dury, the Captain of The City of the Gods; Amaethon, this is my niece, Tera Three-Tery." 

She courtseyed in goddess-princess fashion, which Amaethon seemed to find charming. He clasped her hands briefly the way he had clasped Llew's, and kissed her quickly on both cheeks. "Welcome! It is good to have a new clanswoman!" 

He turned back to Llew. "There is a carriage coming to pick up your bags, but in the meatime, the Embiadwe are running the Tavern this half-month, so come and have a pint so we can get reacquainted."

"That would be delightful," said Llew, the chill in his voice again taking on a sarcastic edge that made clear to everyone that he would not find it delightful at all. But they all went to the Tavern, which was a building just north of the Clearing.

The Tavern was full of gods, more than Tera had known in her entire life, and the blizzard of ever-shifting possibilities that came from all of them being together took her breath away. None of them even glanced their way, beyond venturing an occasional greeting for Amaethon, but she felt that when they entered, the entire disposition of the room had changed. Nobody was looking at them, but everybody was paying attention to them. 

As for Uncle Llew, being in the presence of so many gods seemed to change him physically. All of the gods seemed preternaturally real, but Llew in their presence became almost overwhelming. The rapid shifting of possibilities that she always sensed around him accelerated to the point of being almost dizzying, so that the gods, so well rounded compared to the occasional Vilim servants who flitted around the room, nonetheless seemed flat next to him.  

The three made their way to an empty table in the back and Amaethon ordered small beer from a Vilim barmaid. Then he turned to Llew. "It is good to have you back in The City of the Gods. You have been away far too long." 

Llew's demeanor, already cold, became icier still. "I did not leave willingly, if you recall. We were banished." 

"You were asked to leave for only a hundred years," said Amaethon, "until things could settle down. Here it is, almost a millenium later, and you only now return. You should not have denied the clan your gifts." 

Llew's face grew darker. "What obligations do I have to people who betrayed me and my sister?" This was icily angry in tone, but it was clear that, even so, he was restraining himself.  

Amaethon's mouth set in a firm line, and it seemed to Tera like all of the tables around them tensed. "We only sought peace in a feud that was quickly growing worse. And even if it were not so, your obligations to your clan are still your obligations." 

"No law binds the gods," said Uncle Llew mockingly. "Is this not the saying? There is no obligation. To support one's clan is a courtesy, in exchange for benefits received from the clan." 

"You are as haughty and obstinate now as you ever were. Your clan supported both you and your sister," said Amaethon. 

"Yes," said Llew, "until you betrayed us. You deserve no trust, and the loyalty you will have will be commensurate with the good you do us." 

Amaethon clearly bit back something he was tempted to say. Then, after looking off into the corner of the room a moment, he said, "Very well, then. Have it your way. But you are also here. And your clan is still your clan, however the past may tangle that up. We are still here for you." He looked deliberately at Tera and then significantly at Llew. "Both of you." 

The small beers came at this point. Tera sipped hers, and immediately recognized it as Vilim-made. It was not awful, but it was flat, slightly metallic, in the way Vilim-made food often was. Every god in the Tavern could have made better drink than this. Why make the Vilim do it?

"In any case," Llew was saying, "I am here not for anything to do with myself, but for my niece, so that she might know something of her clan and The City before she is Enrolled." 

Amaethon visibly relaxed. "We are glad of it." He smiled at Tera. "You are from a family of extraordinary ability. The daughter of the Metal Sun! I have no doubt that you will be one of the gems of the Embiadwe." 

"I doubt that I am so extraordinary," said Tera, "but I am excited to be here." 

 They all finished their small beers in silence punctuated only by the most inoffensively bland comments. Then Amaethon said, "The Platform at Brickanbreck has been prepared, if you wish to use the public Platform here." 

"No," said Llew, "I think we will take a wagon up; this is Tera's first time here, and a wagon will let her see more of The City." 

"Of course," said Amaethon, "I also considered that possibility, so there is one ready for you." He smiled ingratiatingly at Llew, but any charm the smile might have been throwing at him bounced off Llew's impervious armor. 

Llew thanked Amaethon, not quite as coldly as his manner up to that point had been, and Llew and Tera  left the Tavern. Outside, they did indeed find the wagon waiting. Uncle Llew immediately set about examining it closely. 

"That was uncomfortable," said Tera to Llew. Llew, engrossed in his examination of the wagon, did not look up as he replied, "Oh, Amaethon is harmless, if irritating; he is not intelligent enough to be a threat." He suddenly stopped, and a smile of almost mischievous delight broke over his face. He put his finger to his lips then pointed at a portion of a beam on the under side of the wagon. 

Tera did not immediately see what Uncle Llew meant, but then she caught it. It was a wooden pin or dowel set into the wood. It was in many ways entirely ordinary. It looked like a wooden pin. It was genuinely of wood. It was helping to hold a board in place. But the possibilities associated with it were subtly off. Because it was actually functioning as a pin should, the possibilities associated with that action were more obvious and immediate; but there were possibilities available to the pin that would not have been, should not have been, available to a mere wooden pin. They were the possibilities of something with a memory, something that could record what was said around it; the pin was in fact an artificial ear, set there as a spy. She would have missed it entirely if Uncle Llew had not pointed it out, but now that she saw it, it was obvious. 

 "Yes," said Uncle Llew gleefully, and very loudly and deliberately. "I've always said that Amaethon is a talentless hack who has spent his entire life failing upward. One might as well feel threatened by a monkey." He climbed into one of the seats of the wagon, and tapped the seat next to him. "Let's be off. Whatever may be said of The City, it is a beautiful place, and I want you to see it while the light is still good."

to be continued

Sunday, September 06, 2026

The Logic of Practice

 On an Aristotelian account of practical reasoning, practical reasoning necessarily has an analogy to theoretical or speculative reasoning; the difference between theoretical reason and practical reason is only one of mode. Thus one represents practical reason syllogically.

MAJOR PREMISE: Everyone in these conditions should take a walk.

MINOR PREMISE: I am in these conditions.

CONCLUSION: <the action of taking a walk>

Aristotle always presents the major of a practical syllogism as having a kind of relative necessity (what must be done, what should be done, what is needed); this is analogous to the major in a theoretical syllogism having a greater universality than the minor. He is also very clear that it concerns a good or end, and that it does even if it is not immediately obvious that it does. Thus we should see the major as identifying a requirement for some good or end in view, where the actual good may be explicit or just implied.

The minor, then, concerns my relevance to the requirement, including my ability to fulfil it. Thus it generally concerns the achievability of the end presented in the major, or, in other words, the possible means to reach it. (Although you can have a minor concerned with the means being lacking in some way.) This results in one of the ways in which the practical syllogism definitely differs from the theoretical syllogism; since the major does not have to apply to me in only one way, the minor does not necessarily exclude the opposing minor; the minor is put forward not because it is true but it is positing something so that something else will be made true. We have power over what we can do, so the minor premise in the practical syllogism is often not the only one we could use. Therefore, while the theoretical syllogism is a syllogism whose purpose requires it to be truth-preserving, the practical syllogism is a syllogism whose purpose is concerned with truth-enacting.

A second difference between the practical syllogism and the theoretical syllogism is that the conclusion of the practical syllogism is actually doing the deed. There is a school of thought that holds that this was a mistake -- that there is reason why we should treat the conclusion of the practical syllogism as distinct from the action itself, and therefore that there should be a distinct 'practical step' between the two. This is, I think, a mistake -- it's analogous, in fact, to the mistake in holding that there needs to be a 'step' of representative ideas between what we see and the world, in which we perceive representative ideas rather than things represented. It also over-assimilates the practical syllogism to the theoretical syllogism, by treating it as nothing but a theoretical syllogism about practice. Instead, the practical syllogism is itself practical, and the conclusion is not something known but something done. Thus the last judgment in practical reasoning is that which is expressed in the action itself. Actions, after all, cannot be wholly separate from the acts of the practical intellect, which they would be if they were separated from its conclusions. When, given an end, we act at once, this is the practical syllogism equivalent of the enthymeme.

We deliberate by means of the practical syllogism, and deliberation often goes wrong, Aristotle says, from faulty middle terms in the practical syllogism; but deliberation is not itself the practical syllogism. Rather, deliberation is related to the practical syllogism something as dialectical reasoning is to the theoretical syllogism; the practical syllogism is something we construct in deliberation, by deliberation. To be rational, of course, it requires a standard. Theoretical or speculative syllogisms, which are constructed in inquiry in order to know the truth of something, are measured by soundness -- truth in a structure appropriate to it. Practical syllogisms also have to have such a standard, but being constructed in deliberation in order to do something, the measure would have to be something like prudentness, i.e., a structure of means appropriate to an end for action.

Saturday, September 05, 2026

Sliding Down

 A few years ago, I said, commenting on my observation of changes in responses by Ethics students to various cases:

I have a sort of standing nightmare that I will have to spend the last decades of my life arguing that, as a matter of fact, it is indeed morally wrong to murder babies.

In this context, it has been interesting to see the furor over the Lindsay Clancy case. The issue is not so much the case itself -- as Clancy has confessed to killing her three children, the issue is not whether she did it, but whether she meets the technical requirements for being incompetent to discern the right and wrong of what she did due to psychosis from postpartum depression, and that is just a matter of jury decision on evidence. The problem with these kinds of cases is never the case itself but with other people using it as a totemic emblem. Many of her supporters have been what can only be called unhinged in their comments; Anne Hendershott at "The Catholic World Report" mostly captures my views on that.

Clancy's jury was hung, requiring the judge to declare a mistrial, so I'm sure we'll be dealing with more of this for some time yet. The repeated public valorization of killers is a sign of something very wrong with people.

Friday, September 04, 2026

Dashed Off XXVI

This opens the notebook begun in June 2025.

***


 modalities of rights
(1) exercise
(2) support
(3) defense
(4) reparation
(5) shared versions of (1)-(4)
(6) vicarious versions of (1)-(4)

security by haystack

The human body is not merely a physical thing but a symbolic sign; the resurrected body will be not merely a sign of ourselves in the image of God but also a symbol of God's action and glory.

'Unit' is prior to 'one unit'; you must know the relevant unit to know whether there is one of it. In this lies much of importance in the philosophy of measurement.

In principle a language could have up to about 125 distinct tones (based on five levels of relative pitch, in which in a single tone may have up to two shifts); in practice, languages rarely have more than fifteen, and most fewer.

It's pointless to fear being wrong, because somewhere you already are; the wise fear not mistakes, but failure to learn from them.

People generally have significant difficulty making sense of the idea that a person, once existing, cna fail to exist; most cultures generally assume that existing persons just continue to exist in some form, and full rejection of this is not very common. Even the Epicureans thought that it took philosophical discipline and careful reasoning to believe it, arguing that people who claimed to believe it without such discipline and reasoning were equivocating. People even have some difficulty with the idea that a person can begin to exist; since we have features that indicate contingency, this is an easier sell for most people, but people are not always particularly consistent about it.

Any set of rational activities can be modeled; but no finite set of models exhaustively models rational activity.

We often learn that something is necessary by first discovering it is always normative. Necessity is then an obvious candidate for the reason why.

"We judge of the design of a contrivance by its predominant tendencies and effects." Edward Hitchcock

The only way to read Plato, Aristotle, etc., correctly is to reason with them toward that which they sought, namely, truth.

Outside of limited contexts, one does not usually reason directly to whether one should be a realist or anti-realist; this falls instead out of the relation fo the topic to vast regions of life.

It is impossible to know what your metaethics is until you know what your ethics is.

Democracies punish themselves by their own tendency to extremes.

Berekely and accepting the given as a gift

"A people devoid of imitation are incapable of improvement, and must go down; for stagnation of necessity brings with it decay and ruin." Alexander Crummell
"...the idea of God contains, inherently, such transforming power in a nation, that it makes or unmakes, according as it is clear, and right, and grand; or, on the other hand, is low, and rude, and sensual."
"A people are always as high as their idea of God."
"Excellence is first rooted in truths. Preeminence springs from ideas. Elevation is the product and outgrowth of convictions."

Analogical inferences may be modulated by our sense of the 'distance' between analogues.

Sensory perceptions by their nature give candidates for things -- this, which i am seeing, is a candidate for a man. Many -- a great many -- of these candidates check out; others (e.g., stump on a dark night) do not.

testimonium intus spiritus sancti
Note that this phrase in fact gives us an account of sorts: it is a testimony, i.e., witnessing event (one thing indicating another), internal rather than external (not sensory perception of evidence beyond oneself, of spiritual things rather than material things), specifically under the aspect of holiness. We also have a set of analogues in relation: human testimony of the Holy Spirit, external experience of the holy (e.g., burning bush), internal experience of spiritual things (e.g., presential self-knowledge and internal knowledge of otherness), internal experience of the external (e.g., memory & imagination), within the web of which we can locate this classificationally.

the sense of culpability (I would be wrong deliberately to do this) and the sense of piacularity (To do this, even unintentionally, would be a transgression)

free decision & interpretation of ambiguity

Sometimes when people call something 'subjective' all they are actually indicating is that the thing requires coordinating multiple tests & heuristics of different kinds rather than having a single criterial test yielding a single quantiative measurement.

All societies have a problem with political parasitism, in which people try to divert resources of the state, which exists to facilitate citizenship in civil society, into things less and less associated with either citizenship or civil society.

Advanced physics tends to tribalize into competing interpretive camps. This seems to arise because the structure of physics as a field at present is dominated by a concern with what must be done next. To work in this, one must interpret what has been done so far, and in the absence of an interpretation that is currently having an extended run of success experimentally, physicists break up according to their different sense of what is interesting and their different evaluations of what is promising.

the form by which one conforms (form proper) vs the form to which one conforms (exemplar)

One of the checks on each branch of the government is the limit of the workload its core can stand: Congress is restricted by the time it has to pass legislation, the President by the number of things he can directly consider, the Supreme Court by the number of cases it can handle. But this also limits their ability to check other branches.

Traditions should answer less to the opinions of the age than to the truths that are eternal.

The primary problem with the Asherah is that she usurps the place for which God (El) designated Israel.

literal use as having proper, deontic, and fictional modes
-- the latter two sometimes marked in English by 'de jure' and 'de facto'

You begin discovery by observing and by speculating, and then by gradually integrating both into each other.

Local consistency is not good enough for human thought; consistent thought requires a constant end, always working in and with the local consistency.

the Euthyphro problem for the man-loved

the Euthyphro as an a fortiori argument for an anti-sophist conclusion

A Marxist analysis of fictional objects works surprisingly well for a number of obvious cases (perhaps bets precisely for the most famous obvious cases, like Santa Claus or Sherlock Holmes).

the novel as "subjective epic" (Goethe)

Good bankruptcy laws facilitate market experimentation.

What counts as a means of production depends on the ideological construction of production; it happens by restructuring the ends of production.

Means of production are always means of production of means.

Every theory of truth presupposes a theory of mind.

The heart of ceremony is memoration.

baptism  & eucharist of desire (spiritual communion being a specification of the latter in the presence of the sacrament; but the eucharistic intention is implicit in baptism)
-- ?: Those who die, having been baptized, but before eucharistic communion, die having communed in spiritual intention, either properly or vicariously.
The eucharist is the Person of Christ; this is key.

Someone who lacks visual imagination might well think that "Picture your loved ones" is a figure of speech, a metaphor for just directing one's thought toward them.

Working with others is a good way to learn how to deal with one's own failures.

kinds of holy feasts
(1) vital: nativities, life events, deaths
(2) metonymic: relics (e.g., translations), instruments (e.g., Cross), seats (e.g., St. John Lateran)
(3) titular: titles

cognation, contact, and coincidence

The largest indigenous families of North American are Uto-Aztecan (whose largest extent member is Nahuatl), Na-Dene (whose largest extant member is Navajo), and Algic (whose largest extant members are Cree and Ojibwe). But North America has universal linguistic diversity, with many smaller families and isolates whose relation to each other is uncertain and difficult to assess. The languages tend to be polysynthetic and consonant-heavy, with head-marking agreement, but there are many variations and large numbers of relatively unique features for particular languages. Some have speculated a link between Na-Dene and the Yenisei language of the Ket people in Asia, but the evidence is primarily genetic rather than genuinely linguistic.

Being is most perfected in love.

The universal destination of goods requires the existence of market interactions of some kind, due to the inevitability of uneqal access (we would often have to exchange things in hand, trade 'places' in access networks, etc., all of which must be negotiated).

Your surmises should always reach farther than your own creative will.

Freedom at its foundations can have no other end and aim but good itself.

the things more excellent than the mind itself

"The possibility and intelligibility of things are inferred from their relation to an efficient power which is capable of bringing them to being and from their relation to an intellect that is capable of understanding them." Aquinas
"The unfailing order we observe in things is sign of their being governed."

Every particular perspective implies a God's-eye point of view.

Governance consists in preserving things in goodness and in moving things to the good.

the cause of hypothesizability

Due process is always with respect to an end.

It is dangerous to confuse stupidity and compassion.

Invincible ignorance exculpates from guilt of being outside the Church, but it does not and cannot save. All it means is that, having had no opportunity, one is not guilty of rejecting opportunity, and thus deserving of none of the penalties specifically arising from rejecting the opportunity.

fictional role : prop :: law : title

An umbrella used as an umbrella in a play is both an actual umbrella and a fictional umbrella.

God would be victorious over sin if even only one person were saved; that is the value of each person's salvation.

The Church of charity is itself the juridical Church, for charity gives birth to right.

baptism as kenosis

The divine mysteries are infinite, and there are uncountable vast regions that are hardly explained, so that it is easy to get lost and go wrong. One must therefore always keep an eye on the maps of the prayerful before one, and often check the compass of one's own prayer and the stars of the public liturgy, and one must never let communication with the rest of the Church wholly break. Above all, one must never simply go off on one's own whim or without studious preparation.

Act always in a manner consistent with the reason of the most common authority and with the most common good, i.e., God as source and God as end.

We mark out important things by pageantry.

humanity as one, moral, universal, and familial society
-- all four of these 'notes' are presently in a defective form due to original sin, but the signs of them still shine through everywhere.

People have a tendency to forget that lex orandi is a lex -- it is, in fact, a customary law of the Church, the Church's custom of prayer given force of precept by the people either directly or through the pastors looking out for their spiritual health.

A sincerely sung Credo is better doctrine than the finest homily.

From the Life of Christ and the history of the Church, we begin to understand the infinite riches of grace.

The history of the Church is the extension of the Life of Christ, the life of Christ as moral, juridical, and sacramental person.

Our moral life cannot be elevated to supernatural community unless our rites are elevated to supernatural community.

anointing of the sick as apokatastasis

Liberal theology is all too often merely the ghost of theology, confined to haunting the edges of human life.

One's understanding of eternal life depends on one's understanding of baptism; the two cannot be wholly separated.

In art, realism is constructed, and therefore is never the default.

the real vs. the realistic, the impression vs. the impressionistic, the expression vs. the expressionistic

The hypothesis that is simplest with respect to one kind of inference may not be according to another.

Genuine development of doctrine is never willful.

Division between stimulus and response is determined by causal analysis; it is not given in the experience itself.

Scientific fictions allow for explanation by proxy.

Nothing is luck except in the context of purpose.

Thursday, September 03, 2026

St. Gregorius

Today is the feast of Pope St. Gregory the Great, Doctor of the Church. From his Moralia in Iob (Book XXXI, sections 18-19)

But hypocrites know not these bowels of charity. Because the more their mind is let loose on outward subjects by worldly concupiscence, the more is it hardened within, by its want of affection. And it is frozen by benumbing torpor within, because it is softened by fatal love without; and is unable to consider itself, because it strives not to think of itself. But a mind cannot think on itself, which is not entirely at home in itself. But it is unable to be entirely at home in itself, because by as many lusts as it is hurried away, by so many objects is it distracted from itself; and scattered, it lies below, though with collected strength it might rise, if it willed, to the greatest heights. 

Whence the mind of the just, because it is restrained, by the guardianship of discipline, from the shifting desire of all visible objects, is compacted in itself and inwardly entire; and it fitly beholds how it should conduct itself towards God, or its neighbour, because it leaves nothing of its own without, and the more it is withdrawn and restrained from outward objects, the more is it increased and kindled within; and the more it burns, the more brightly does it shine for the detection of vices. For hence it is, that while holy men gather themselves within themselves, they detect even the secret faults of others, with a wonderful and penetrating keenness of sight....


Wednesday, September 02, 2026

Nikanor

 Nikanor, or Nicanor, is a historical figure we know almost exclusively from 1 Maccabees and 2 Maccabees. He was a Seleucid general who served in Judea during the Maccabean revolt, and who had to be defeated by the Maccabees to break the oppressive yoke of the Hellenistic Kingdom of Syria. In a sense, he's the major antagonist of the whole story.

Famously, though, 1 Maccabees and 2 Maccabees give very different impressions of Nicanor. 1 Maccabees takes an unrelentingly hostile view of him:

Then the king sent Nicanor, one of his most distinguished officers and a bitter enemy of Israel, with orders to destroy the people. Having arrived in Jerusalem with a large force, he sent to Judas and his brothers this deceitful message couched in peaceful terms: “Let there be no fighting between you and me. I shall come with a small escort to have a peaceful meeting with you.” When he came to Judas, they greeted each other peaceably, but the enemy had made plans to kidnap Judas. When Judas became aware that Nicanor’s visit had a treacherous purpose, he became afraid and refused to meet him again. (1 Macc. 7:26-30)

Thus Nicanor is recognized (1) as an enemy of Israel (2) who has orders to destroy the people and (3) who sends a lying offer of peace (4) in which his plan is really to kidnap Judas; (5) Judas becomes aware of this and avoids him.

2 Maccabees gives us a very different picture:

The king immediately chose Nicanor, who had been in command of the elephants, and appointed him as governor of Judea. Then, he sent him forth with orders to put Judas to death, to disperse his followers, and to install Alcimus as high priest of the great temple. However, when Nicanor heard of the bravery exhibited by Judas and his men and how courageously they always fought for their country, he became reluctant to allow the issue to be settled by bloodshed. Therefore, he sent Posidonius, Theodotus, and Mattathias to negotiate a treaty of peace. After a lengthy discussion of the terms, each leader explained them to his troops, and all were of one mind in favor of accepting them. On the day decided upon for the respective leaders to meet privately, a chariot came forward from each side, and thrones were set in place. Judas had posted armed men at strategic points to prevent any sudden act of treachery on the part of the enemy. In this way, the conference was held without any complications. Nicanor stayed on in Jerusalem and did nothing there that could be construed as a hostile act. He sent away the crowds that had rallied to him, but he always kept Judas close to him, for he became deeply attached to him. He urged him to marry and have children, and Judas did marry and settle down to lead the quiet life of an ordinary citizen. (2 Macc. 14:12, 18-25)

Thus Nicanor is (1) reluctant to harm the people, (2) despite the fact that he has orders to do so, and to do that (3) genuinely tries to negotiate a treaty of peace and (4) becomes deeply attached to Judah Maccabee (5) who becomes friends with him.

Very different pictures. There is no actual contradiction. The author of 2 Maccabees is clear elsewhere that the book is an abridged adaptation of another work, and that the author is deliberately taking complicated events and trying to tell an uncomplicated story with them. Thus 2 Maccabees is explicitly not giving a direct history, but an easy adaptation of a way those events have been seen. It is also more removed from events in another way; it was written, probably Hellenistic Egypt, in Greek, and is giving a depiction of events from this sort of external perspective. On the other side, 1 Maccabees covers a more extended historical period, with the inevitable result that it only focuses on what is essential to the story it is telling, and is very clearly a Hasmonean Kingdom account of what the Hasmonean dynasty was about. 1 Maccabees has a consistent theme of judgment of oppressors, and so tends to emphasize things that bring that out. 2 Maccabees, on the other hand, has a consistent theme of God's mercy to Israel on behalf of the Jewish martyrs, and so it tends to emphasize things that bring that theme out. They are both unabashedly from a particular point of view, and there is no more contradiction between them than there is between two different points of view on the same events.

What really strikes me though, is that even if one took them straightforwardly, there is no actual contradiction, either. All of the following can be true together:

Nicanor was opposed to Israel and had orders to destroy them.
He was actually impressed by the people of Israel and wanted to avoid unnecessary bloodshed.
He opened negotiations with a double purpose to bring peace with minimal bloodshed and get Judah (the major obstacle to it) out of the way.
He ends up actually liking Judah.
He tries to encourage Judah to stop what he is doing and settle down.
Judah becomes friends with him, and begins to follow his advice.
Judah at some point becomes aware of Nicanor's original deceptive intent and begins to distance himself from him.

And when we look at how this all ends, of course, we find that both 1 Maccabees and 2 Maccabees agree that this did not end well for Nicanor, and that the Jews in the end had Nicanor's head cut off and displayed. (2 Maccabees is even very clear that this was authorized by Judah.) This is entirely consistent with everything above. 2 Maccebees claims that Alcimus -- the guy the king had appointed high priest -- forced Nicanor's hand by accusing him of treasonous intentions due to his friendship with Judah, leading Nicanor reluctantly to break his agreements with Judah. Thus the 2 Maccabees version of Nicanor ends in exactly the same place as the 1 Maccabees version.

I think one can argue that this is partly the point, and is the point with less obvious cases in, e.g., the histories of the kings of Israel and Judah in the Old Testament. People are just this complex, and understanding them historically requires taking into account both the fact that people can have different legitimate perspectives on them, due to having different purposes in view, and the fact that they themselves can have layers of motivation in their choices and decisions. This is one of the lessons we have to learn in order to deal with people. It is also one of the most difficult things to learn. 

Tuesday, September 01, 2026

Spotless in Array

 We Had a Female Passenger
by William Wordsworth

We had a female Passenger who came
From Calais with us, spotless in array,--
A white-robed Negro, like a lady gay,
Yet downcast as a woman fearing blame;
Meek, destitute, as seemed, of hope or aim
She sate, from notice turning not away,
But on all proffered intercourse did lay
A weight of languid speech, or to the same
No sign of answer made by word or face:
Yet still her eyes retained their tropic fire,
That, burning independent of the mind,
Joined with the lustre of her rich attire
To mock the Outcast. -- O ye Heavens, be kind!
And feel, thou Earth, for this afflicted Race!

September 1, 1802