Saturday, May 30, 2026

Hermann Hesse, The Glass Bead Game

 Introduction

Opening Passage: The book has a frame including a 'General Introduction', and some poems and short stories attributed to Joseph Knecht, but really the beginning of the work is tucked in this phrase, and begins with the beginning of Joseph Knecht's vocation:

No knowledge has come down to us of Joseph Knecht's origins. Like many other pupils of the elite schools, he either lost his parents early in childhood, or the Board of Education removed him from unfavorable home conditions and took charge of him. In any case, he was spared the conflict between elite school and home which complicates the youth of many other boys of his type, makes entry into the Order more difficult, and in some cases transforms highly gifted young people into problem personalities. (p. 47)

Summary: The feuilleton was a newspaper supplement invented by French newspapers in the nineteenth century in response to censorship laws. There would be line drawn on the page, separating part of it from the main news, usually in smaller print, and this supplementary material would be devoted to art reviews, cultural commentary, gossip, serialized fiction, epigrams, jokes, reports of scientific discoveries, and the like. What newspaper editors discovered is that censors were less interested in this material; you could get away with a lot more 'under the line', including even political commentary if you dressed it up as a review of a play or opera. It is a good example of the ingenuity of human thought. But notice also that one of the things it does is relegate all serious intellectual thought to the same status as gossip columns and horoscopes. The 'serious story' is what avoids all serious comment, which could get you into trouble; the real intellectual life occurs under the line. But putting something under the line also limits how deep it can be; everything in the feuilleton is superficial, which is why the censors don't care so much, and under the line you cannot really discuss anything in the way it deserves.

The events of The Glass Bead Game occur well into the future; the exact is indeterminate in the story, but Hesse says elsewhere that he thought of the story is occuring at the beginning of the 25th century. The people of that time look back on us and call our age the Age of the Feuilleton. From their perspective, real intellectual life in our age is something we barely know how to do; it is an age in which everything of cultural and intellectual value was forced under the line and treated as not the real thing, but a sort of lark in which you are allowed some exception to the way your real life works. This is not to say that there was no intellectual life at all, of course; but it is hard to have any real approach to intellect and culture if your intellectual life consists  entirely of essays on things like Friedrich Nietzsche's relationship to women's fashion, or superficial surveys of historical topics, or crossword puzzles. (The sort of things, in other words, that are found in most newspapers and, for that matter, the internet, today.) Everything is just bits and pieces, nothing handled at depth, and amusement rather than vocation. All of this would likely be fine, if it were part of a larger intellectual and cultural ecosystem that was fundamentally based on system and depth and vocation. But when it began to be treated as the foundation of intellectual and cultural life, the result was world wars and many other terrible things. 

Enter the Glass Bead Game. Originally, it was precisely that: a game played with glass beads. It was developed in the field of music as a method for improving memory and improvisation. One player would call out some muscial bit -- a bar or a motif or the like -- and the other player would respond with continuation and variation. This call-and-response then began to be tracked on a framework with glass beads (like a very complicated abacus). Eventually this game caught the attention of mathematicians, who worked out the underlying mathematical theory for the game as it worked on the glass-bead frame. This mathematical theory turned out to be remarkably generalizable, and was taken up in philology, visual arts, and so forth, and while the Glass Bead Game continued to be played, the actual glass beads eventually dropped out; instead, people used the symbolic notations developed by applying the mathematics to different fields. And because the same general set of symbolic notations could apply to music, painting, sculpture, literature, and so forth, the game, while still showing in its general structure and some of its content its musicological origins, had long since stopped being played solely in terms of music. It became a game of point and counterpoint, of theme and variation, for all the arts taken together. The Age of the Feuilleton was over. The Glass Bead Game did for art and culture what the experiment had done for science and industry, and the explosion of interest in it was an intellectual revolution on the same scale the Scientific Revolutions and the Industrial Revolutions had been.

But all things come to an end. (One of the themes of the book.) In the case of the Scientific Revolution, experimental science raised field after field with intellectual advances, but at the same time, these things grew more and more remote from the ordinary lives of people. A game that could originally be played by anyone, to great general interest and excitement, became increasingly professionalized and nonprofessionals were pushed out, sometimes just by being outcompeted but sometimes by rather more forceful gatekeeping. Experimental science still retained its centrality in education, but the gatekeeping created a line between the science and the world outside, and the world outside began more and more to see science not as a common possession of humanity but as a thing to use for its own end, as a matter of investment and return, the notion of science for the sake of science being increasingly seen as an egghead quirk of scientists that you had to indulge to the extent -- and only to the extent -- that it went along with getting something useful. Scientists on their end became much less careful about the ways in which the expenses and difficulties and problems associated with their work burdened the outside world, which fed into a vicious cycle in which the world increasingly wondered why it was paying for all of this. At the same time, the success of the experimental sciences repeatedly led people to flatten intellectual life in order to force into the (perceived) mold of this or that scientifice success; all of human intellectual life began to be treated, not scientifically, because the discoveries had never been made for such thing, but scientistically, as if the experimental models were the reality and everything else (including actual human intellectual life) was just details. The result is a sort of decline even as experimental science continued to achieve great successes. 

This is all, of course, a feuilletonistic history. But the point of it is that as Joseph Knecht, the hero of the novel, enters the picture, the same pattern of decline is occurring for the Glass Bead Game, as well. There still are Glass Bead Game enthusiasts who play it as amateurs, but they are diminishing, and they are increasingly poorly regarded by the professionals, and the professionals are mostly found in relative isolation in the elite schools in the Pedagogical Province of Castalia, paid for almost entirely by the world outside, whose attitude has begun to move from enthusiasm to tolerance, and which is increasingly inclined to see the Glass Bead Game as an ivory-tower amusement for eggheads rather than a human activity valuable for all. It is also clear that the Glass Bead Game itself is causing an intellectual stagnation; once an immense field for creativity, it is flattening everyone's view, as they see all of intellectual life, every artistic field, as just what it is in the Glass Bead Game.

Joseph Knecht is a bright boy who does extraordinarily well in school and soon catches the interest of members of the Board of Education as having a promising future in the Glass Bead Game. Because of this he is sent to the top school in Castalia, majoring in music. He first receives fame by a series of debates with a fellow student, Plinio Designori, who is from a wealthy family who send students to the Castalian schools because learning about the Glass Bead Game stuff is what cultured people do; Joseph defends the Castalian way of life in the face of Plinio's more pragmatic and merely utilitarian view. His performance in these debates is a partial contributor to his first assignment when he graduates, to go to a Benedictine monastery and teach the Glass Bead Game to their small group of Glass Bead Game enthusiasts.

It's an odd assignment. The Catholic Church is very ambiguous about the Glass Bead Game; it has itself contributed some notable players, but also has been very critical of certain aspects of it. The Benedictine monks Joseph is sent to teach are very, very amateur. Nonetheless, a Benedictine monastery always has an intellectual life, and Joseph slowly develops a friendship with Father Jacobus at the monastery; Jacobus is one of the world's foremost historians. He also has a significant influence at the Holy See, and this turns out to be the key to why Joseph has been sent to the middle of nowhere to teach a bunch of amateurs things that are, to him, very basic. The Board that governs Castalia has begun to worry about its position with respect to the outside world, and naturally wants to make allies. The Catholic Church is currently in an upswing in its diplomatic influence and is also in many ways the major institution that has the most in common with Castalia itself. Joseph's handling of the debate with Plinio had shown that he had some skill as a sort of ambassador, and thus Joseph was sent to the monastery in the hope that it would be a first step toward overcoming, or at least getting around, the Holy See's standoffish skepticism about Castalia. This ends up being a wildly successful move on the part of the Castalians, since this is precisely what happens.

The success will lead eventually to Joseph Knecht being chosen Magister Ludi, the chief teacher, so to speak, of the Glass Bead Game. This is a role he will fulfill in exemplary fashion. But he finds himself occasionally uneasy. His colleagues don't really seem to grasp the precarity of Castalia's position with respect to the outside world. He will meet up with Plinio again, and come to the conclusion that Castalia did a disservice to Plinio in many ways. His familiarity with history, learned from the Benedictine historian, leads him to worry that Castalia and the Glass Bead Game are themselves becoming increasingly feuilletonesque. He himself has a creative side, writing poetry and short stories and music, that does not sit easily with the routines of professional intellectual life in Castalia.  As time goes on he finds that what really interests him is teaching the Glass Bead Game to mere beginners. All of this leads him to become the scandal of the age when, first of all the members of the Board of Education in Castalia history, he resigns.

In many ways, the Glass Bead Game itself is a more interesting character than Joseph Knecht himself. (Hesse's descriptions of it are certainly extraordinarily memorable, perfectly balanced to make it not quite clear how it works and yet perpetually intriguing at every point.) Joseph Knecht is just the point at which things come to a head. He is caught up in events over which he has relatively little control, and he becomes of interest mostly because he is both an exemplary Magister Ludi and the first person eccentric enough to understand that something is going wrong with the Game. Things could hardly have ever ended up entirely well for him; he has a personality that tends toward immersion, and failing that, immolation. But in a sense Joseph's life is itself a Glass Bead Game on a grand scale, a correlation of many cultural values across many disciplinary lines, into a unity. And in this Game he comes up with something creative. As his name, Knecht, implies, what the Glass Bead Game has begun to lose, and which needs to be reclaimed, is genuine service, the life and death of service to the world with which the Castalians are increasingly estranged.

Favorite Passage:

"Of course one should bring order into history," Jacobus thundered. "Every science is, among other things, a method of ordering, simplifying, making the indigestible digestible for the mind. We think we have recognized a few laws in history and try to apply them to our investigations of historical truth. Suppose an anatomist is dissecting a body. He does not confront wholly surprising discoveries. Rather, he finds beneath the epidermis a congeries of organs, muscles, tendons, and bones which generally conform to a pattern he has brought to his work. But if the anatomist sees nothing but his pattern, and ignores the unique, individual reality fo his object, then he is a Castalian, a Glass Bead Game player; he is using mathematics on the least appropriate object. I have no quarrel with the student of history who brings to his work a touchingly childish, innocent faith in the power of our m inds and our methods to order reality; but first and foremost he must respect the incomprehensible truth, reality, and uniqueness of events. Studying history, my friend, is no joke and no irresponsible game. To study history one must know in advance that one is attempting something fundamentally impossible, yet necessary and highly important. To study history means submitting to chaos and nevertheless retaining faith in order and meaning. It is a very serious task, young man, and possibly a tragic one." (pp. 168-169)

Recommendation: Highly Recommended.

*****

Hermann Hesse, The Glass Bead Game, Richard & Clara Winston, trs., Henry Holt & Co. (New York: 1990).

Friday, May 29, 2026

Dashed Off XIV

This ends the notebook that was finished in March 2025.

 

The best known truths are always amenable to metaphor.

Wisdom possesses in stillness what all other cognitive actions and state approximate in motion.

nest, burrows, and hunting territories as proto-institutions
-- they are materially the sorts of things, playing a relevant role in behavior appropriate for institutions, and could thus be institutions if formally recognized as such

Moral advice is obviously real, and its being moral, and thus is moral fact even if we assume falsely that moral counsels are the only moral facts.

The inability to find silver linings is a grave political debility.

It is common for people who have always had something to fail to grasp the significance of it.

People often confuse artifice-based (constructed) realism with anti-realism.

games as soluble-problem creation

All real persons are also possible fictional persons.

Pretty much everyone is sometimes better and often worse than they think.

"It is crazy to want what is impossible, and impossible for the wicked not to do so." Marcus Aurelius

"I am a rational creature, so I must sing hymns to the God." Epictetus

To be fully understood, arguments often have to be tried out in various ways.

We are not made sick by the presence of a virus but by what the virus does that impedes our bodily functions, directly or indirectly.

You need to develop and maintain minor skills in order to develop and maintain in major skills.

quasi-concordia, quasi-benevolentia, quasi-beneficentia as elements of relationship with a favorite book

All genuine benevolence requires a prior concord.

(concord -> benevolence) -> beneficence

The simpler the field, the easier it is to be an anti-realist about it.

French National Domain in the Holy Land: Church of the Paternoster (Eleona), St. Mary of the Resurrection Abbey, Tombs of the Kings, Church of Saint Anne

practical advisability as an indirectly moral concept

Sovereignty is a form of moral & juridical personality involving a right to legislate that is supreme in its jurisdiction-associated order.

All sovereignty is over people qua some X (as citizen, as tribal member, as creature, as resident, as territorial user, as subject, etc.), where X fixes order and jurisdiction.

A common problem empires have is that they end up training their own military opponents.

Law is a practical matter and heavily dependent on classifications, so it tends to fall out of a structure based on possible classifications of aspects of action:
(1) classification of sources of action: (a) individual statuses, (b) group statuses
(2) classification of circumstantial components of action
(3) classification of norms relevant to action
(4) classification of effects of action.

Document presupposes archive.

Practical inquiries impose standards of admissibility on evidence in light of the practical ends of inquiry.

To do justice to the true, the good, and the beautiful, one must sometimes reflect on the one, the something, and the other.

ens commenticium : ens rationis :: ens artificiale : ens reale

ens rationis: ens logicum, ens commenticium, ends ideale, ens palliolatum

"If I premise that my experience is not merely the production of the mental activity of my own nature; in other words, not merely a dream, in which you are my vision as I am yours, but in which the external as well as the internal has its share in my experience, then everything that is alike in our experience must bear a corresponding similitude in external circumstances." Oersted

No account of scientific discovery is adequate that ignores the joy of it.

"Light is the great proclaiming power of the world." Oersted

Evolutionary explanations often fail to grasp that many things are always happening at once.

weld, woad, and madder

The more intellectual a cause is, the harder it is to fit into a concrete/abstarct dichotomy, because its causal activity suggests both.

the integrity, substantiveness, and distinctiveness of discourse (e.g., of a fictional work)

Lv 19:33-34 and the Christian treatment of non-Christians who live in peace with Christians
-- much of Lv 19 can be seen as identifying specific forms, sometimes symbolic, of general conditions for being the People of God.
-- note that Ex 24:48-49 (cp. Nm 9:14) foresees the possibility of the stranger as participating directly through circumcision and PAssover, but only in becoming in some sense no longer a foreigner (cf. vv. 43-45). [Nm 15:14-16, 29, extends this to sacrifice.] Thus the 'resident non-Christian' may pray with us (sacrifice of sweet aroma), and shall not be barred from Eucharist (Passover) if he is also willing first to be baptized (circumcision), but must follow the laws on all of the these things. Nm 15:25-29 indicates that prayers for the whole congregation extend, at least sometimes, even to the non-Christian residing in the midst of the Christian assembly.
-- this certainly inclues the catechumenate; are there other categories (e.g., non-Christian spouses?)

to consider: bishops exercising divine authority per suffragium

the papal power of suppletio defectuum (power to provide remedies where the need arises from mere lack
-- related to the authority to confirm the brethren

Most of the good anyone does is in exchange for other good.

All explanation ultimately traces back to infinity.

Pleasure and pain are quite loosely correlated with survival and reproduction; they are relevant to them but also don't track them very tightly.

Every society has a mythological (imaginative), an aspirational, and an actual structure.

Reading is itself a kind of fine art.

We anticipate the wills even of people we don't know -- often badly, but inevitably.

Natural history fundamentally depends on the notion of goodness for a population of living things.

Mysticism is the hardest road to truth; it is the challenge of the climb and the triumph of overcoming it that is the attraction.

We trust most those whom we trust both from a recognition of their trustworthiness and from a recognition of the need to trust.

Every person projects a sake/behalf/cause qua person and bearer of value.

"Just as we would never see our face were it not for a mirror, so, too, we would never see our own inner life opposite us -- were it not for the mirror of art." Landmann-Kalischer

beauty as the value that reflects all other values

"The world is a collection of mutable things that are next to each other, follow upon one anotther, but which are overall connected with one another." Wolff
"The knowledge of the reason of things that are or occur is called philosophy."
"Philosophy is the science of the possibles insofar as they can be."
"If the reason of that which belongs to a species is contained in the notion of the genus, then things which we know philosophically are applied to more problems of human life than things which we know only historically."

To know many things, the human mind must first be wrong about many things.

Every liberty has a teleology.

"By *example* we mean a representation of something more determined which is supplied to clarify the representation of soemthing less determined." Baumgarten

Allegiance is not something human beings can deserve.

To the mission of the Church, we are all expendable; for the substance of the Church, we are each of infinite and everlasting value.

The very living of a human life posits some goodness to cosmos.

Comfort is an insatiably devouring god.

We should strive for what would be pleasing in a virtuous version of our society.

It is because we do not merely cognize but conceive that we can shape our judgments and reasonings.

Names are given by special fixation; it does not follow that they then only refer, nor even that there is anything special about their reference in itself.

'A new gunslinger comes to town; he's smooth-shaven, so we call him The Kid. The Kid is staying at The Royal Flush, having arrived by a riverboat, the *Far Horizon*. The Royal Flush is at the intersection of Pine and Red Oak Farm, which is where Red Oak Farm used to be. The Kid's actual name is Elwin, which means 'elf-friend'. He shouldn't be confused with the other Elwin in town.'
-- Any theory of names that cannot make sense of every sentence and proper name here is already wrong.

Theories of names often involve confusion of properties and predicates.

(1) Some beings are not real beings but rational beings.
(2) A being has properties in the way it has being.
(3) Quantifiers can be ampliated beyon the domain of real beings.
(4) We can reer to any being that can be an object of thought.

The aesthetics of sexuality can only connect to real sex by way of secrecies and privacies; this is one reason why pornographic cultures and subcultures so often seem weirdly sexless.

Never trust the feeling of empowerment.

'One person, one vote' obviously cannot apply to every person (people are not advocating that babies or juridical persons be given votes), nor can it apply to every vote. For it to apply, we must first coordiante the kind of person with the kind of vote. When we are talking about different kinds of vote (e.g., votes in Norway, votes in California), we change the persons to be consdiered; when we are talking about different kinds of person (e.g., citizen of Canada, citizen of Mexico), we change the votes to be considered.

People generally amp up public displays of sexuality to compensate for feelings of disorer, confusion, or even lack in actual sex.

The recognition of some sense of being 'self-made' is essential to the existence of a free society; and one notices whenever people attack the notion, that they are always trying to justify forcing people to do something.

Every instrumentalism is a realism about something else.

In ethics as in other things, unusual outliers can throw off our reasoning.

You will never find a democracy without fools.

patience as the maintenance of reserve forces

the integral, the real, the richly diverse

Genius by its nature makes use of lesser skills, and is limited or expanded by the lesser skills it has available.

Most politicsdoes not occur by persuasion, and most persuasion does not occur by rational justification.

"It is reciprocal action governed by proportion that keeps the city together." Aristotle

the prudent as that which tends to reasonable friendship in a way appropriate to friendship

All the evils of utilitarianism are tied to its obliteration of all consideration of the kind, mode, and order of means.

Jer 33:20-21 and the parallelbetween creation (physical nature) and covenant (social nature)

You get out of an educational institution what you put into it.

"Without friends no one would choose to live, though he had all other goods." Aristotle

Friendship is the foundation for shared good.

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Exalted Above the Heavens

In some calendars, today, as the Thursday after Pentecost, is the Feast of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest. 

 Now there have been many of those priests,
since death prevented them from continuing in office;
but because Jesus lives forever,
he has a permanent priesthood.
Therefore he is able to save completely
those who come to God through him,
because he always lives to intercede for them.
Such a high priest truly meets our need—
one who is holy, blameless, pure,
set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens.
Unlike the other high priests,
he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day,
first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people.
He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself.
For the law appoints as high priests men in all their weakness;
but the oath, which came after the law,
appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.

[Hebrews 7:23-28, NIV]

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Whose Death Is the World's Desire

The Hunting of the Dragon
by G. K. Chesterton 

When we went hunting the Dragon
In the days when we were young,
We tossed the bright world over our shoulder
As bugle and baldrick slung;
Never was world so wild and fair
As what went by on the wind,
Never such fields of paradise
As the fields we left behind:

For this is the best of a rest for men
That men should rise and ride
Making a flying fairyland
Of market and country-side,
Wings on the cottage, wings on the wood,
Wings upon pot and pan,
For the hunting of the Dragon
That is the life of a man. 

For men grow weary of fairyland
When the Dragon is a dream,
And tire of the talking bird in the tree,
The singing fish in the stream;
And the wandering stars grow stale, grow stale,
And the wonder is stiff with scorn;
For this is the honour of fairyland
And the following of the horn; 

Beauty on beauty called us back
When we could rise and ride,
And a woman looked out of every window
As wonderful as a bride:
And the tavern-sign as a tabard blazed,
And the children cheered and ran,
For the love of the hate of the Dragon
That is the pride of a man. 

The sages called him a shadow
And the light went out of the sun:
And the wise men told us that all was well
And all was weary and one:
And then, and then, in the quiet garden,
With never a weed to kill,

We knew that his shining tail had shone
In the white road over the hill:
We knew that the clouds were flakes of flame,
We knew that the sunset fire
Was red with the blood of the Dragon
Whose death is the world’s desire. 

For the horn was blown in the heart of the night
That men should rise and ride,
Keeping the tryst of a terrible jest
Never for long untried;
Drinking a dreadful blood for wine,
Never in cup or can,
The death of a deathless Dragon,
That is the life of a man.

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Links of Note

 * Eliyahu Rotenberg, Some Thoughts on the Philosophy of Law in Judaism, at "Ignatius of Zion"

* Katie Curtis, The Creative Retrieval of Aquinas in W. Norris Clarke, at "Chasing Logos"

* Chester H. Sunde, Psy.D., Plato Never Said 'Forms'

* Chris Fraser, The Limitations of Ritual Propriety: Ritual and Language in Xunzi and Zhuangzi (PDF)

* T. Benjamin White, I Read the Steinbeck Werewolf Book So You Don't Have To, at "The Composted Book Review"

* Hillel Wayne, Points are a weird and inconsistent unit of measure, on typographical points, at "Computer Things"

* Denis Kambouchner & Louis Rouquayrol, Descartes' Ethics, at the SEP

* Ahmed Alwishah & David Sanson, The Liar Paradox in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy, at the SEP

* B. A. Clarke, Pre-decimal Currency Was Mostly Fine, at "Clarke's Corner"

* Rob Alspaugh, The Point of ST I-II Q8 a2, at "Teaching Boys Badly"

* Casual Physics Enjoyer, The Particle Comes Alive, looks at the physics of particles in fluids

Monday, May 25, 2026

Magnifica Humanitas

 Pope Leo XIV recently released the encyclical letter, Magnifica humanitas. It explicitly positions itself as a sequel to Pope Leo XIII's Rerum novarum, but is also, I think, a deliberate sequel to Pope Francis's Dignitas infinita. Unfortunately, it has a lot of the problems that seem endemic to Church documents these days -- the things that suggest that perhaps it should have been thought through a bit more carefully. The claim that Nehemiah "did not impose solutions from above" is baffling; Nehemiah spends a significant part of the book giving orders, rebuking nobles and officials, and appointing people to be in charge. It is true that he works to reforge the community identity of the Israelites, and it is true that the Israelites respond well to his plans, which seems to be what is primarily in view, and I very much like the appeal to Nehemiah (who provides a good example of a laity-driven approach to reform), but the characterization of Nehemiah's work seems oddly selective.This is a recurring problem, as, again, has been common in Church documents recently.* Some people have noted that the writing, ironically, has a lot of stylistic similarities with results of AI programs, probably not because AI was used but because AI also tends to slide into this vaguely inspirational now-this-now-that committee-speak, of which Church officials have been the masters for years now.

Nonetheless, the encyclical is a nice summary of the social teaching of the Church. And contrary to the way it is sometimes being presented, it is largely positive about AI research, and just lays down exactly the sort of moral principles for such research that one would expect it to give. As some have noted, it doesn't even call for a ban of autonomous weapons systems -- it just insists that they "must be subject to the most rigorous ethical constraints, to guarantee respect for human dignity and the sanctity of life and to avoid a race to develop such arms" (section 197). This is remarkably weak.

What seems to be the intended point -- it could be clearer, but a number of things converge on this interpretation -- is that matters like the ethics of AI research require a significant amount of initiative on the part of the laity in general, distinct from any direct interference by the clergy; it thus reiterates the general principles that the laity need to keep in mind when dealing with any matter, like AI research, that can affect our understanding of human dignity. Read in that light, it does this very well. I just wish we were out of the era of throw-everything-in-somehow document-writing.

----

* One of the more interesting ones here is when it says that "the 'just war' theory, which has all too often been used to justify any kind of war, is now outdated" (section 192), but all the things it explicitly rejects are common modern modifications of the traditional just-war view, while it repeatedly says things that have commonly been said in traditional versions of just war theory. (For instance, one might think that it was proposing a pacifist approach, but then it goes on to give, sections 197-200, a discussion of how military decisions in war should be made, which explicitly appeals to principles of just war theory!)

Sunday, May 24, 2026

Two Poem Drafts

 Nightfall

The evening, creeping now
on shower-watered fields,
builds in depth; the sun bows;
wonderfully to night it yields.

I sit alone in shadowed room,
still as stone, and wait
as fate is woven on the loom
with gloom; and there I ruminate.

The outer black, a sheet
like doubt, now covers all
and falls the night, complete,
against all light a wall.

The clouds are hiding stars,
the wide world is hid away,
yet night neither hides nor mars
the glory of light of day.

A dawn will come, will burn,
upturn the rule of shade,
and I will coolly yearn
and sigh for hope remade.


Connection

On page unmarked I mark a line;
I draw it straight and true
from mine to yours and yours to mine,
made even, as is due.

In silent air I draw a word
to reach through time and space
and on your ear alight, thus heard
with harmony and grace.

By light I speak, from eye to eye,
with glistening tear and hue;
to make a circuit, photons fly
between my heart and you.

I fold the world and make it small
to hold us both in bound;
within this O, I compass all:
here infinity is found.