Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Red Rain

The Epistle to Yemen is also our main source of knowledge for a more extensive messianic movement that formed around a Moroccan Jew named Moshe el-Darri, who arrived in Andalusia in the late 1130s or early '40s with the tidings that he was the Messiah's herald. El-Darri, too, performed "miracles," such as predicting that on a certain day the heavens would rain blood--and indeed, Maimonides wrote, a "red and grimy" rain fell that day. (Red dust rain, originating in fine particles of airborne soil from the Sahara Desert, is a known meteorological phenomenon in southern Spain.) Many of el-Darri's followers obeyed his instructions to sell all their property and borrow money that would not have to be repaid because the Messiah was arriving on Passover, leaving them homeless and penniless when the holiday came and went. El-Darri himself fled to Palestine and died there.
[Hillel Halkin, Yehuda Halevi, Schocken (New York: 2010) p. 97]

The phenomenon is also called rain dust; while it is not always red -- that depends on the color of the soil -- it's quite common. In West Texas, for instance, if you cross a dusty summer with sudden rain storms you'll find it raining mud on occasion. However, it is massively more common in Iberia, for precisely the reason given here: dust from a great big desert across the way gets blown over and rained down. Not all red rain is from dust, however; some is thought to be caused by certain kinds of algae, and it's algae, for instance, that form the phenomenon of watermelon snow (pink to red, with a fruity scent, but probably not good for your body) that some places in the world know.
M ↓   Markdown
?
Anonymous
0 points
13 years ago

What would it mean to "think with one's body"?

B
branemrys
0 points
13 years ago

The real question is what it would mean not to think with one's body. Some ways in which we do:

  • We estimate heights relative to eye-level.
  • Goal-directed movement involves constant kinaesthetic feedback -- it's not a mere brain-to-hand thing, for instance, but a complex interaction.
  • We develop motor learning skills.
  • We count with our fingers, thus using our bodies directly as cognitive instruments.
  • When trying to rotate imaginary shapes, we can use our hands to simulate the rotation, thus keeping track of the sides.
  • When trying to understand what someone else's feelings are, it often helps to go physically through the same motions and facial expressions.
  • We make use of 'gut feelings'.
  • We analogize things to our bodies (Roger Scruton has some good discussion of this, if I recall correctly, in the context of music).

In other words, we measure with our bodies, simulate with our bodies, train our bodies to give the right solutions to problems, use our bodies as metaphors, not to mention sense with them. The list could be made very long. Despite the fact that we do this a lot, we don't do it very systematically, nor do we take full advantage of the potential. And despite that only very specific kinds of cognitive activity, a much smaller number than our full cognitive panoply, can be located wholly in the brain, we still tend to think of ourselves as stuck inside our skulls somehow. But when I am counting with my fingers, my cognitive act of counting is not in the brain; it's a brain-nervous system-muscular system  interaction involving brain, arm, and hand.

B
branemrys
0 points
13 years ago

Hmm. MrsDarwin had a comment, but it seems to have bypassed Disqus somehow.   Here it is:

I was going to protest "Love is drama", but on further consideration this makes sense. Drama is change, and love (at least human love) requires constant change and alteration to thrive. Even an externally happy, peaceful love demands constant internal self-abegnation and readjustment of priorities on the part of the individual lovers - "dying to self" is the traditional religious description of the drama of love.

?
Anonymous
0 points
13 years ago

For research purposes: sent that comment from my cell phone.